Lisa E. Hines

38 papers receiving 785 citations

Peers

Lisa E. Hines
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 471
  • Family Practice 126
  • Toxicology 133
  • Health Information Management 120
  • Medical Terminology 4
Replace Birgit Eiermann with:
Birgit Eiermann Sweden
Hanna M. Seidling Germany
A.W. Lenderink Netherlands
Jacob Abarca United States
David W. Bates United States
Pieter Cornu Belgium
Anne Gerd Granås Norway
Bengt Åstrand Sweden
R. Roubille France
Michael Barras Australia
Lisa E. Hines relative to Birgit Eiermann Sweden Birgit Eiermann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Birgit Eiermann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lisa E. Hines

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa E. Hines's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa E. Hines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa E. Hines more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa E. Hines

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa E. Hines. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa E. Hines. The network helps show where Lisa E. Hines may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lisa E. Hines, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lisa E. Hines Line = papers co-authored together Lisa E. Hines links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011202
2 2015101
3 201092
4 201658
5 201248
6 200937
7 201726
8 201120
9 201120
10 201119
11 201117
12 201115
13 201212
14 201012
15 201112
16 202011
17 201310
18 201310
19 202110
20 20118

About Lisa E. Hines

Lisa E. Hines is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Health Information Management and Family Practice, having authored 40 papers that have together received 824 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (32 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (10 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (9 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (8 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (8 papers), Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions (6 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (5 papers) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (471 citations), Family Practice (126 citations), Toxicology (133 citations), Health Information Management (120 citations) and Medical Terminology (4 citations). Lisa E. Hines has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Chile. Frequent co-authors include John E. Murphy, Daniel C. Malone, Amy J. Grizzle, Terri Warholak, Ann M. Taylor, Kim Saverno, Mary Brown, Richard D. Boyce, Michael Wittie and Raymond L. Woosley. Their work appears in journals such as Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact