Lisa Appignanesi
- Clinical Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- History top 5%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Philosophy top 10%
- Co-authors
- John ForresterSusie OrbachJohn V. Forrester
- Topics
- Medical History and Research (1 paper)Psychoanalysis and Social Critique (1 paper)Freedom of Expression and Defamation (1 paper)
- Journals
- L Homme et la sociétéIndex on CensorshipResearch Portal (King's College London)
- Partner nations
- IndiaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Lisa Appignanesi
12 papers receiving 158 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Clinical Psychology 73
- Sociology and Political Science 71
- History 38
- Literature and Literary Theory 35
- Philosophy 35
Countries citing papers authored by Lisa Appignanesi
This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa Appignanesi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa Appignanesi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa Appignanesi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa Appignanesi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa Appignanesi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa Appignanesi. The network helps show where Lisa Appignanesi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lisa Appignanesi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lisa Appignanesi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lisa Appignanesi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lisa Appignanesi. Lisa Appignanesi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fifty Shades of Feminism | 2 |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | All About Love: Anatomy of an Unruly Emotion | 2 |
| 5 | Mad, bad and sad : a history of women and the mind doctors from 1800 to the present | 48 |
| 6 | Mad, bad and sad : women and the mind doctors | 8 |
| 7 | Mad, Bad and Sad | 1 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | Free Expression Is No Offence | 7 |
| 10 | The Memory Man | 2 |
| 11 | The Year Is '42 | 1 |
| 12 | Die Frauen Sigmund Freuds | 0 |
| 13 | Freud's women | 67 |
| 14 | The Rushdie File | 35 |
| 15 | Dismantling truth : reality in the post-modern world | 57 |
| 16 | Ideas from France: The Legacy of French Theory | 4 |
| 17 | Femininity & the creative imagination;: A study of Henry James, Robert Musil & Marcel Proust | 1 |
About Lisa Appignanesi
Lisa Appignanesi is a scholar working on General Psychology, Cultural Studies and Law, having authored 17 papers that have together received 242 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical History and Research (1 paper), Psychoanalysis and Social Critique (1 paper) and Freedom of Expression and Defamation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (24 citations), History (38 citations) and Clinical Psychology (73 citations). Lisa Appignanesi has collaborated with scholars based in India and United States. Frequent co-authors include John Forrester, Susie Orbach and John V. Forrester. Their work appears in journals such as L Homme et la société, Index on Censorship and Research Portal (King's College London).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.