Ling Lin

915 citations
20 papers · 468 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Ling Lin

19 papers receiving 453 citations

Peers

Ling Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Pharmaceutical Science 139
  • Literature and Literary Theory 93
  • Language and Linguistics 48
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 55
  • Biomaterials 42
Replace Yanli Zhao with:
Yanli Zhao China
Christina Gustafsson Sweden
Kirandeep Κaur India
Janet deGrazia United States
Guihua Cui China
Afsar Rouhi Iran
P Marion France
Robert Cavanagh United Kingdom
Fei Fei China
Nini Li China
Ling Lin relative to Yanli Zhao China Yanli Zhao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15.5×
Yanli Zhao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ling Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ling Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ling Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ling Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ling Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ling Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ling Lin. The network helps show where Ling Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ling Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ling Lin Line = papers co-authored together Ling Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2013121
2 2011119
3 201369
4 201340
5 201728
6 202222
7 201914
8 202110
9 20189
10 20158
11 20217
12
Innovations in structuring article introductions: The case of Applied Linguistics
20145
13 20225
14 20153
15 20222
16 20192
17 20182
18 20231
19 20221
20 20180

About Ling Lin

Ling Lin is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Literature and Literary Theory, Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 20 papers that have together received 468 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (4 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (3 papers), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (2 papers), Writing and Handwriting Education (2 papers), Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (2 papers), Protein purification and stability (2 papers), Crystallization and Solubility Studies (2 papers) and Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (139 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (93 citations), Language and Linguistics (48 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (55 citations) and Biomaterials (42 citations). Ling Lin has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Evans, Ming Lü, Yongcheng Li, Zhefei Guo, Chuanbin Wu, Yixuan Dong, Xiaoyun Yu, Kangqiang Qiu, Cheng‐Yong Su and Dai‐Bin Kuang. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Pharmaceutics, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Molecular Pharmaceutics, AAPS PharmSciTech and Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact