Line Caes

2.5k citations
90 papers · 1.8k indexed · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Line Caes

82 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Line Caes
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 1.2k
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 135
  • Pharmacy 130
  • Pharmacology 416
  • Clinical Psychology 476
Replace Amy S. Lewandowski with:
Amy S. Lewandowski United States
Robyn Lewis Claar United States
Paula Forgeron Canada
Cynthia Karlson United States
Kristi D. Wright Canada
Nicole E. Mahrer United States
Elena Castarlenas Spain
Maggie H. Bromberg United States
Malin Eberhard‐Gran Norway
Amy L. Salisbury United States
Line Caes relative to Amy S. Lewandowski United States Amy S. Lewandowski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Amy S. Lewandowski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Line Caes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Line Caes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Line Caes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Line Caes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Line Caes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Line Caes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Line Caes. The network helps show where Line Caes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Line Caes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Line Caes Line = papers co-authored together Line Caes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 90 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010139
2 2016127
3 2015113
4 201593
5 201487
6 201160
7 201856
8 201250
9 201349
10 201948
11 201546
12 201146
13 201542
14 201242
15 201442
16 202037
17 201636
18 201435
19 201432
20 202031

About Line Caes

Line Caes is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pharmacology, Pharmacy, Speech and Hearing and Clinical Psychology, having authored 90 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (62 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (28 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (25 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (23 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (13 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (9 papers), Infant Health and Development (7 papers) and Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (1.2k citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (135 citations), Pharmacy (130 citations), Pharmacology (416 citations) and Clinical Psychology (476 citations). Line Caes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Liesbet Goubert, Tine Vervoort, Christopher Eccleston, Christine T. Chambers, Lesley Verhofstadt, Marieke Van Schoors, Melissa A. Alderfer, Kathryn A. Birnie, Abbie Jordan and Zina Trost. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, Journal of Pediatric Psychology, European Journal of Pain, Clinical Journal of Pain and Journal of Pain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026