Lindsey King

1.7k total citations
49 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Lindsey King is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Lindsey King has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 14 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 11 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Lindsey King's work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (9 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (8 papers) and Birth, Development, and Health (8 papers). Lindsey King is often cited by papers focused on Reproductive Health and Technologies (9 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (8 papers) and Birth, Development, and Health (8 papers). Lindsey King collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Italy. Lindsey King's co-authors include Susan T. Vadaparampil, Gwendolyn P. Quinn, Crystal Wilson, Cheryl A. Miree, Heather B. Clayton, Michael L. Nieder, Clement K. Gwede, Pamela N. Münster, Valerie E. Whiteman and Anupam Pradhan and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and SLEEP.

In The Last Decade

Lindsey King

43 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Lindsey King United States 17 691 585 476 128 105 49 1.2k
Agnieszka Drosdzol–Cop Poland 24 538 0.8× 690 1.2× 287 0.6× 111 0.9× 239 2.3× 134 1.9k
Andreas Ernst Denmark 18 401 0.6× 364 0.6× 633 1.3× 78 0.6× 43 0.4× 81 1.3k
Fiona Bruinsma Australia 15 344 0.5× 192 0.3× 322 0.7× 45 0.4× 92 0.9× 43 1.0k
Violetta Skrzypulec Poland 18 248 0.4× 437 0.7× 201 0.4× 68 0.5× 94 0.9× 42 887
Mariana Moura­‐Ramos Portugal 18 525 0.8× 689 1.2× 349 0.7× 14 0.1× 51 0.5× 51 1.3k
Carolyn Alexander United States 15 396 0.6× 421 0.7× 213 0.4× 37 0.3× 43 0.4× 30 894
Melissa J. Whitrow Australia 20 343 0.5× 181 0.3× 397 0.8× 151 1.2× 109 1.0× 31 1.1k
Ruben Alvero United States 21 649 0.9× 794 1.4× 447 0.9× 44 0.3× 46 0.4× 79 1.4k
Ditte Vassard Denmark 16 279 0.4× 432 0.7× 289 0.6× 33 0.3× 30 0.3× 40 780
Violetta Skrzypulec‐Plinta Poland 18 340 0.5× 240 0.4× 60 0.1× 111 0.9× 172 1.6× 95 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Lindsey King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lindsey King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lindsey King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lindsey King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lindsey King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lindsey King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lindsey King. The network helps show where Lindsey King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lindsey King

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lindsey King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lindsey King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lindsey King. Lindsey King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
King, Lindsey, et al.. (2024). The Barriers That Adolescents and Young Adults with Endometriosis Experience in the United States: A Conceptual Review and Model. Sexuality Research and Social Policy. 22(2). 580–595.
2.
3.
Edwards, Mary, et al.. (2023). A scoping review: the psychosocial barriers that exist for people with vulvodynia. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 20(6). 833–858. 14 indexed citations
4.
King, Lindsey, et al.. (2023). Interorganizational collaboration in a trauma‐informed community: A network analysis of cohesion and change. Journal of Community Psychology. 52(1). 89–104.
6.
King, Lindsey, et al.. (2022). Tobacco-related health inequalities among Black Americans: A narrative review of structural and historical influences. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse. 23(3). 381–411. 1 indexed citations
7.
King, Lindsey, et al.. (2022). What does community resilience mean in the context of trauma‐informed communities? A scoping review. Journal of Community Psychology. 50(8). 3325–3353. 10 indexed citations
9.
King, Lindsey, et al.. (2021). Organizational partnerships for a trauma‐informed community: A community‐wide social network study. Journal of Community Psychology. 49(7). 2658–2678. 6 indexed citations
10.
Salihu, Hamisu M., et al.. (2019). Racism, Psycho-Social Stress, and Health-related Quality of Life. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9(1). 73–76. 7 indexed citations
11.
Salihu, Hamisu M., Lindsey King, Anupam Pradhan, et al.. (2017). Evidence of altered brain regulatory gene expression in tobacco-exposed fetuses. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 45(9). 1045–1053. 9 indexed citations
12.
Salihu, Hamisu M., et al.. (2016). Association Between Maternal-Perceived Psychological Stress and Fetal Telomere Length. Southern Medical Journal. 109(12). 767–772. 25 indexed citations
13.
Louis‐Jacques, Adetola, Hamisu M. Salihu, Lindsey King, et al.. (2016). A positive association between umbilical cord RBC folate and fetal TL at birth supports a potential for fetal reprogramming. Nutrition Research. 36(7). 703–709. 16 indexed citations
14.
Salihu, Hamisu M., et al.. (2014). Impact of intrauterine tobacco exposure on fetal telomere length. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 212(2). 205.e1–205.e8. 66 indexed citations
15.
Sonis, Jeffrey, Elisa Triffleman, Lindsey King, & Daniel L. King. (2009). How to Write an NIH R13 Conference Grant Application. Academic Psychiatry. 33(3). 256–260. 4 indexed citations
16.
Quinn, Gwendolyn P., Susan T. Vadaparampil, Lindsey King, et al.. (2009). Impact of physicians’ personal discomfort and patient prognosis on discussion of fertility preservation with young cancer patients. Patient Education and Counseling. 77(3). 338–343. 121 indexed citations
17.
Quinn, Gwendolyn P., Susan T. Vadaparampil, Lindsey King, Cheryl A. Miree, & Sue Friedman. (2009). Conflict between values and technology: perceptions of preimplantation genetic diagnosis among women at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Familial Cancer. 8(4). 441–449. 30 indexed citations
18.
Vadaparampil, Susan T., Gwendolyn P. Quinn, Lindsey King, Crystal Wilson, & Michael L. Nieder. (2008). Barriers to fertility preservation among pediatric oncologists. Patient Education and Counseling. 72(3). 402–410. 128 indexed citations
19.
Clayton, Heather B., Gwendolyn P. Quinn, Ji‐Hyun Lee, et al.. (2008). Trends in Clinical Practice and Nurses' Attitudes About Fertility Preservation for Pediatric Patients With Cancer. Oncology nursing forum. 35(2). 249–255. 40 indexed citations
20.
Quinn, Gwendolyn P., Susan T. Vadaparampil, Clement K. Gwede, et al.. (2007). Discussion of fertility preservation with newly diagnosed patients: oncologists’ views. Journal of Cancer Survivorship. 1(2). 146–155. 195 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026