Linda Jo Bone
About
In The Last Decade
Linda Jo Bone
6 papers receiving 619 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 420
- Molecular Biology 356
- Neurology 156
- Neurology 89
- Cell Biology 74
Countries citing papers authored by Linda Jo Bone
This map shows the geographic impact of Linda Jo Bone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linda Jo Bone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linda Jo Bone more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Linda Jo Bone
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Linda Jo Bone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Linda Jo Bone. The network helps show where Linda Jo Bone may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Linda Jo Bone
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Linda Jo Bone. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Linda Jo Bone based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Linda Jo Bone. Linda Jo Bone is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 239 | |
| 3 | 209 | |
| 4 | 110 | |
| 5 | Connexin32 and X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. | 14 |
| 6 | 45 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.