Lincoln G. Scott
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Organic Chemistry
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry top 5%
- Materials Chemistry
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Co-authors
- James R. WilliamsonM. HennigMartha J. FedorBlair R. SzymczynaWolfgang BermelMarco TonelliLuc JaegerJared Davis
- Topics
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (12 papers)RNA modifications and cancer (10 papers)DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (8 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of the American Chemical SocietyJournal of Biological Chemistry
- Partner nations
- United StatesTürkiyeDenmark
In The Last Decade
Lincoln G. Scott
32 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Molecular Biology 895
- Organic Chemistry 129
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 109
- Materials Chemistry 98
- Spectroscopy 92
Countries citing papers authored by Lincoln G. Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of Lincoln G. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lincoln G. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lincoln G. Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lincoln G. Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lincoln G. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lincoln G. Scott. The network helps show where Lincoln G. Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lincoln G. Scott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lincoln G. Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lincoln G. Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lincoln G. Scott. Lincoln G. Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 75 | |
| 4 | 29 | |
| 5 | 33 | |
| 6 | 33 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | 54 | |
| 9 | 51 | |
| 10 | 62 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 38 | |
| 13 | 120 | |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 28 | |
| 17 | 57 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | 20 |
About Lincoln G. Scott
Lincoln G. Scott is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biophysics and Biochemistry, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (12 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (10 papers) and DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (895 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (109 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (36 citations). Lincoln G. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Türkiye and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include James R. Williamson, M. Hennig, Martha J. Fedor, Blair R. Szymczyna, Wolfgang Bermel, Marco Tonelli, Luc Jaeger, Jared Davis, Samuel E. Butcher and Thomas J. Tolbert. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.