Lincoln Chayes
- Condensed Matter Physics top 5%
- Mathematical Physics top 5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 10%
- Statistics and Probability top 5%
- Co-authors
- Marek BiskupRoberto H. SchonmannGlen SwindleZohar NussinovJeroen van den BrinkSteven A. KivelsonJennifer ChayesJonathan Machta
- Topics
- Theoretical and Computational Physics (18 papers)Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (14 papers)Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods (5 papers)
- Journals
- Physical Review LettersPhysical review. B, Condensed matterThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Lincoln Chayes
24 papers receiving 328 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Condensed Matter Physics 266
- Mathematical Physics 137
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 89
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 77
- Statistics and Probability 65
Countries citing papers authored by Lincoln Chayes
This map shows the geographic impact of Lincoln Chayes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lincoln Chayes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lincoln Chayes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lincoln Chayes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lincoln Chayes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lincoln Chayes. The network helps show where Lincoln Chayes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lincoln Chayes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lincoln Chayes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lincoln Chayes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lincoln Chayes. Lincoln Chayes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | Quantum spin systems at finite temperature | 1 |
| 5 | 59 | |
| 6 | 24 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 51 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 41 | |
| 20 | PERCOLATION AND RANDOM MEDIA: LECTURE NOTES FOR LES HOUCHES, SUMMER 1984 | 1 |
About Lincoln Chayes
Lincoln Chayes is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Condensed Matter Physics and Statistics and Probability, having authored 26 papers that have together received 346 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theoretical and Computational Physics (18 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (14 papers) and Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (266 citations), Mathematical Physics (137 citations) and Statistics and Probability (65 citations). Lincoln Chayes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Marek Biskup, Roberto H. Schonmann, Glen Swindle, Zohar Nussinov, Jeroen van den Brink, Steven A. Kivelson, Jennifer Chayes, Jonathan Machta, Teia M. Schweizer and A. Lücke. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.