Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The effectiveness of partial pair programming on elementary school students’ Computational Thinking skills and self-efficacy
This map shows the geographic impact of Lin Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lin Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lin Lin more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lin Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lin Lin. The network helps show where Lin Lin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lin Lin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lin Lin.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lin Lin based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Lin Lin. Lin Lin is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lin, Lin. (2016). Conservation of Historic and Cultural Cities in the Context of the New Normal: Perspective of Historic Urban Area. 101.4 indexed citations
Lin, Lin, et al.. (2015). Collaborative problem solving in shared space. MADOC (University of Mannheim). 233–239.1 indexed citations
14.
Lin, Lin, et al.. (2014). Improving Critical Thinking with Interactive Mobile Tools and Apps.. Social studies and the young learner. 26(4). 10–14.7 indexed citations
15.
Zhang, Hui, Dezhong Peng, Lin Lin, et al.. (2013). Altered gene-expression profile in rat plasma and promoted body and brain development by environmental enrichment. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY. 12(20). 3071–3082.1 indexed citations
16.
Lin, Lin & Tao Zhang. (2011). Playing exergames in the classroom: Pre-service teachers’ motivation, passion, effort, and perspectives. The Journal of Technology and Teacher Education. 19(3). 243–260.11 indexed citations
17.
Lin, Lin. (2010). Limited Partnership: A New Business Vehicle in People's Republic of China. SSRN Electronic Journal. 25(2). 104–109.
18.
Lin, Lin, et al.. (2009). Human multitasking abilities: Learning tasks vs. performance tasks. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2009(1). 2589–2592.1 indexed citations
Lin, Lin & Patricia Cranton. (2003). Psychological Preference and Online Asynchronous Written Dialogue. E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. 2003(1). 1694–1697.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.