Lim

435 total citations
11 papers, 271 citations indexed

About

Lim is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Marketing and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Lim has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 271 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 2 papers in Marketing and 2 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Lim's work include Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (1 paper) and Torture, Ethics, and Law (1 paper). Lim is often cited by papers focused on Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (1 paper) and Torture, Ethics, and Law (1 paper). Lim collaborates with scholars based in Hong Kong, Singapore and New Zealand. Lim's co-authors include Soh, Su, Cui , Zhou, ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� Anderson, Goh, Jennifer, Chin, Lee - and Chen and has published in prestigious journals such as MIS Quarterly, Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique and EUROPEAN RESEARCH STUDIES JOURNAL.

In The Last Decade

Lim

8 papers receiving 246 citations

Peers

Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Sociology and Political Science 121
  • Management Information Systems 72
  • Marketing 51
  • Strategy and Management 50
  • Communication 48
Replace Faith Noble with:
Faith Noble United Kingdom
Jingchuan Pu United States
Mumin Abubakre United Kingdom
Carol Guercio Traver
Kishen Iyengar United States
Jung‐Chieh Lee China
Nour Mohammad Yaghoubi Iran
Aidan Duane Ireland
Ren‐Zong Kuo Taiwan
Boyka Simeonova United Kingdom
Faith Noble United Kingdom View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Lim
Lim · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Lim
Lim · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lim. The network helps show where Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lim

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lim. Lim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2
A Framework for Examining Assessment Literacy of Preservice Teachers
2
3 130
4 2
5
An introduction to Technology Forecasting with a TFDEA Excel add-in
8
6
The Relationship of Society, Company and Consumers in Product Service System
0
7 103
8
Implications of Multi-Level Model in Disciplinary Practices of Social Sciences
1
9
Power, Race, and Gender in Academe: Strangers in the Tower?
21
10
Kidnapping Law Mapped Out
1
11 3

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026