Development of a Chinese Internet addiction scale and its psychometric study
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w55223269 →Countries where authors are citing Development of a Chinese Internet addiction scale and its psychometric study
This map shows the geographic impact of Development of a Chinese Internet addiction scale and its psychometric study. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Development of a Chinese Internet addiction scale and its psychometric study with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Development of a Chinese Internet addiction scale and its psychometric study more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Development of a Chinese Internet addiction scale and its psychometric study
This network shows the impact of Development of a Chinese Internet addiction scale and its psychometric study. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Development of a Chinese Internet addiction scale and its psychometric study.
About Development of a Chinese Internet addiction scale and its psychometric study
This paper, published in 2003, received 383 indexed citations . Written by Li‐Jen Weng, Yuhao Su, Hui‐Ching Wu, Pei–Ming Yang, WL Chen and Wu Hm covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science and Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (347 citations), Education (213 citations) and Clinical Psychology (98 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w55223269.