Lieke Hol

2.5k total citations
40 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Lieke Hol is a scholar working on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Lieke Hol has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Oncology, 19 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 17 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Lieke Hol's work include Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (28 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (14 papers) and Diverticular Disease and Complications (9 papers). Lieke Hol is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (28 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (14 papers) and Diverticular Disease and Complications (9 papers). Lieke Hol collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Canada and United States. Lieke Hol's co-authors include Ernst J. Kuipers, Monique E. van Leerdam, Marjolein van Ballegooijen, J. Dik F. Habbema, Anneke J. van Vuuren, Jacqueline C. Reijerink, Janneke Wilschut, Herman van Dekken, Leonie van Dam and Marie‐Louise Essink‐Bot and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

In The Last Decade

Lieke Hol

38 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Lieke Hol
Stephen P Halloran United Kingdom
Djenaba Joseph United States
Kate Wooldrage United Kingdom
C M Mangham United Kingdom
Humaid O. Al‐Shamsi United Arab Emirates
Vesna Zadnik Slovenia
Lieke Hol
Citations per year, relative to Lieke Hol Lieke Hol (= 1×) peers Véronique Bouvier

Countries citing papers authored by Lieke Hol

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lieke Hol's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lieke Hol with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lieke Hol more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lieke Hol

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lieke Hol. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lieke Hol. The network helps show where Lieke Hol may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lieke Hol

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lieke Hol. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lieke Hol based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lieke Hol. Lieke Hol is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Brayda‐Bruno, Marco, et al.. (2024). Efficacy of EUS-guided keyhole biopsies in diagnosing subepithelial lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 12(10). E1183–E1189. 1 indexed citations
2.
Goos, Jacqueline A.C., et al.. (2024). Diagnostic yield of endoscopic and EUS-guided biopsy techniques in subepithelial lesions of the upper GI tract: a systematic review. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 99(6). 895–911.e13. 10 indexed citations
3.
Meulen, Miriam P. van der, Monique E. van Leerdam, Ernst J. Kuipers, et al.. (2017). Do Men and Women Need to Be Screened Differently with Fecal Immunochemical Testing? A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 26(8). 1328–1336. 17 indexed citations
4.
Hol, Lieke, Marco J. Bruno, & Djuna L. Cahen. (2016). Follow-up of asymptomatic pancreatic cysts in clinical practice: A vignette questionnaire. Pancreatology. 16(3). 416–422. 9 indexed citations
5.
Roon, Aafke H C van, Monique E. van Leerdam, Anneke J. van Vuuren, et al.. (2015). Attendance and diagnostic yield of repeated two-sample faecal immunochemical test screening for colorectal cancer. Gut. 66(1). 118–123. 29 indexed citations
6.
Hol, Lieke, et al.. (2014). Attendance and Yield Over Three Rounds of Population-Based Fecal Immunochemical Test Screening. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 109(8). 1257–1264. 90 indexed citations
7.
Dam, Leonie van, Ida J. Korfage, Ernst J. Kuipers, et al.. (2013). What influences the decision to participate in colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy?. European Journal of Cancer. 49(10). 2321–2330. 49 indexed citations
8.
Wilschut, Janneke, J. Dik F. Habbema, Monique E. van Leerdam, et al.. (2011). Fecal Occult Blood Testing When Colonoscopy Capacity is Limited. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 103(23). 1741–1751. 59 indexed citations
9.
Hol, Lieke, Herman van Dekken, J. Han van Krieken, et al.. (2011). Inter-observer variation in the histological diagnosis of polyps in colorectal cancer screening. Histopathology. 58(6). 974–981. 49 indexed citations
10.
Wilschut, Janneke, Lieke Hol, Evelien Dekker, et al.. (2011). Cost-effectiveness Analysis of a Quantitative Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Gastroenterology. 141(5). 1648–1655.e1. 97 indexed citations
11.
Roon, Aafke H C van, Lieke Hol, Janneke Wilschut, et al.. (2011). Advance notification letters increase adherence in colorectal cancer screening: A population-based randomized trial. Preventive Medicine. 52(6). 448–451. 49 indexed citations
12.
Roon, Aafke H C van, Janneke Wilschut, Lieke Hol, et al.. (2010). Diagnostic Yield Improves With Collection of 2 Samples in Fecal Immunochemical Test Screening Without Affecting Attendance. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 9(4). 333–339. 76 indexed citations
14.
Hol, Lieke, Monique E. van Leerdam, Marjolein van Ballegooijen, et al.. (2009). Screening for colorectal cancer: randomised trial comparing guaiac-based and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gut. 59(1). 62–68. 368 indexed citations
15.
Bekker‐Grob, Esther W. de, Lieke Hol, Bas Donkers, et al.. (2009). Labeled versus Unlabeled Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: An Application to Colorectal Cancer Screening. Value in Health. 13(2). 315–323. 162 indexed citations
16.
Dam, Leonie van, Lieke Hol, Esther W. de Bekker‐Grob, et al.. (2009). What determines individuals’ preferences for colorectal cancer screening programmes? A discrete choice experiment. European Journal of Cancer. 46(1). 150–159. 69 indexed citations
17.
Hol, Lieke, Janneke Wilschut, Marjolein van Ballegooijen, et al.. (2009). Screening for colorectal cancer: random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing at different cut-off levels. British Journal of Cancer. 100(7). 1103–1110. 204 indexed citations
18.
Mensink, Peter, Lieke Hol, Robert H. Geelkerken, et al.. (2009). Transient postprandial ischemia is associated with increased intestinal fatty acid binding protein in patients with chronic gastrointestinal ischemia. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 21(3). 278–282. 15 indexed citations
19.
Hol, Lieke, Leonie van Dam, Esther W. de Bekker‐Grob, et al.. (2009). W1981 What Determines Individuals' Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests? a Discrete Choice Experiment. Gastroenterology. 136(5). A–766. 1 indexed citations
20.
Hol, Lieke, Indra C. van den Bos, Shahid M. Hussain, Pieter E. Zondervan, & Robert A. de Man. (2008). Hepatocellular carcinoma complicating biliary atresia after Kasai portoenterostomy. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 20(3). 227–231. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026