Leonie van Dam

694 total citations
17 papers, 514 citations indexed

About

Leonie van Dam is a scholar working on Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Leonie van Dam has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 514 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Oncology, 6 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 5 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Leonie van Dam's work include Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (14 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (6 papers) and Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (5 papers). Leonie van Dam is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (14 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (6 papers) and Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (5 papers). Leonie van Dam collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Leonie van Dam's co-authors include Ernst J. Kuipers, Monique E. van Leerdam, Ewout W. Steyerberg, Lieke Hol, Marie‐Louise Essink‐Bot, Esther W. de Bekker‐Grob, Bas Donkers, J. Dik F. Habbema, Marjolein van Ballegooijen and Ida J. Korfage and has published in prestigious journals such as Gastroenterology, The Lancet Oncology and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Leonie van Dam

16 papers receiving 505 citations

Peers

Leonie van Dam

ONCOL

PRM

GHP

PFM

Alex Ghanouni United Kingdom

Sandro Stoffel United Kingdom

Meghan C. O’Leary United States

Sarah Hoeck Belgium

Tiefu Shen United States

Anne Prenzler Germany

Gordon Fehringer Canada

Tina Žagar Slovenia

Natalie Fitzgerald Canada

Keith Argenbright United States

Alex Ghanouni United Kingdom

Leonie van Dam

395 ×1.5

ONCOL

93 ×0.5

114 ×1.2

PRM

164 ×1.8

GHP

42 ×0.5

PFM

Citations per year, relative to Leonie van Dam Leonie van Dam (= 1×) peers Alex Ghanouni

Countries citing papers authored by Leonie van Dam

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leonie van Dam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leonie van Dam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leonie van Dam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leonie van Dam

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leonie van Dam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leonie van Dam. The network helps show where Leonie van Dam may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leonie van Dam

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leonie van Dam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leonie van Dam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leonie van Dam. Leonie van Dam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

Mes, Jurriaan J., Els Oosterink, Teus Luijendijk, et al.. (2025). Bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) supplementation for twelve weeks improves biomarkers of glucose homeostasis in a prediabetic population. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 347. 119756–119756. 1 indexed citations

Grobbee, Esmée J., Eline H. Schreuders, Leonie van Dam, et al.. (2022). Guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests versus faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2022(6). CD009276–CD009276. 34 indexed citations

Heuvel, S. van den, Laura Zwaan, Leonie van Dam, et al.. (2017). Estimating the costs of work-related accidents and ill-health: An analysis of European data sources. 14 indexed citations

Dam, Leonie van, et al.. (2016). Different modalities for colorectal cancer screening: experiences in The Netherlands so far. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 5(1). 9–19. 1 indexed citations

Schreuders, Eline H., Esmée J. Grobbee, Leonie van Dam, et al.. (2016). Mo1156 Meta-Analysis on Guaiac-Based Fecal Occult Blood Tests Versus Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Average-Risk Individuals. Gastroenterology. 150(4). S653–S653.

Dam, Leonie van, Daan Dierickx, Fedro A. Peccatori, et al.. (2015). 3205 Obstetrical complications and neonatal outcome in patients diagnosed with acute myeloid and acute lymphoblastic leukemia during pregnancy: Results from the International Network on Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy (INCIP) study. European Journal of Cancer. 51. S650–S650. 1 indexed citations

Dam, Leonie van & Michael Bretthauer. (2014). Ethical issues in colorectal cancer screening. Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology. 28(2). 315–326. 14 indexed citations

Dam, Leonie van, Ida J. Korfage, Ernst J. Kuipers, et al.. (2013). What influences the decision to participate in colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy?. European Journal of Cancer. 49(10). 2321–2330. 49 indexed citations

Dam, Leonie van, Monique de Haan, Esther M. Stoop, et al.. (2013). Time requirements and health effects of participation in colorectal cancer screening with colonoscopy or computed tomography colonography in a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. 45(3). 182–188. 8 indexed citations

10.

Dam, Leonie van, Ernst J. Kuipers, Ewout W. Steyerberg, Monique E. van Leerdam, & Inez D. de Beaufort. (2012). The price of autonomy: should we offer individuals a choice of colorectal cancer screening strategies?. The Lancet Oncology. 14(1). e38–e46. 21 indexed citations

11.

Korfage, Ida J., Leonie van Dam, Jacqueline C. Reijerink, et al.. (2012). Quality of life in participants of a CRC screening program. British Journal of Cancer. 107(8). 1295–1301. 19 indexed citations

12.

Dam, Leonie van, Ann G. Zauber, Marjolein van Ballegooijen, et al.. (2011). Guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests versus faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 5 indexed citations

13.

Hol, Lieke, Esther W. de Bekker‐Grob, Leonie van Dam, et al.. (2010). Preferences for colorectal cancer screening strategies: a discrete choice experiment. British Journal of Cancer. 102(6). 972–980. 75 indexed citations

14.

Dam, Leonie van, Ernst J. Kuipers, & Monique E. van Leerdam. (2010). Performance improvements of stool-based screening tests. Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology. 24(4). 479–492. 40 indexed citations

15.

Bekker‐Grob, Esther W. de, Lieke Hol, Bas Donkers, et al.. (2009). Labeled versus Unlabeled Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: An Application to Colorectal Cancer Screening. Value in Health. 13(2). 315–323. 162 indexed citations

16.

Dam, Leonie van, Lieke Hol, Esther W. de Bekker‐Grob, et al.. (2009). What determines individuals’ preferences for colorectal cancer screening programmes? A discrete choice experiment. European Journal of Cancer. 46(1). 150–159. 69 indexed citations

17.

Hol, Lieke, Leonie van Dam, Esther W. de Bekker‐Grob, et al.. (2009). W1981 What Determines Individuals' Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests? a Discrete Choice Experiment. Gastroenterology. 136(5). A–766. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact