Liam Ennis

1.1k total citations
29 papers, 723 citations indexed

About

Liam Ennis is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Liam Ennis has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 723 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Clinical Psychology, 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 5 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Liam Ennis's work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (12 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (7 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (7 papers). Liam Ennis is often cited by papers focused on Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (12 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (7 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (7 papers). Liam Ennis collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Liam Ennis's co-authors include Til Wykes, Diana Rose, Mike Denis, Sandy Jung, L. Alvin Malesky, William D. Murphy, Michael C. Seto, Felicity Callard, Dan Robotham and Karen Buro and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, The British Journal of Psychiatry and BMC Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Liam Ennis

28 papers receiving 676 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Liam Ennis Canada	13	338	274	230	93	88	29	723
Rhiannon Evans United Kingdom	13	385 1.1×	232 0.8×	155 0.7×	62 0.7×	75 0.9×	41	709
Hilary F. Byrnes United States	18	290 0.9×	362 1.3×	263 1.1×	56 0.6×	76 0.9×	46	849
Xanthe Hunt South Africa	15	257 0.8×	169 0.6×	147 0.6×	39 0.4×	68 0.8×	84	714
Ginette G. Ferszt United States	15	265 0.8×	153 0.6×	219 1.0×	59 0.6×	132 1.5×	45	551
Karleigh Darnay Canada	11	377 1.1×	263 1.0×	124 0.5×	77 0.8×	67 0.8×	23	723
Jo River Australia	15	320 0.9×	324 1.2×	162 0.7×	43 0.5×	107 1.2×	43	881
John Mendoza Australia	12	197 0.6×	208 0.8×	226 1.0×	146 1.6×	66 0.8×	25	609
Agnete Skovlund Dissing Denmark	11	236 0.7×	122 0.4×	145 0.6×	63 0.7×	61 0.7×	20	506
Allie Slemon Canada	15	339 1.0×	278 1.0×	117 0.5×	60 0.6×	87 1.0×	44	683
Melissa J. Cox United States	15	229 0.7×	448 1.6×	128 0.6×	106 1.1×	124 1.4×	44	922

Countries citing papers authored by Liam Ennis

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Liam Ennis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liam Ennis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liam Ennis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Liam Ennis

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liam Ennis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liam Ennis. The network helps show where Liam Ennis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Liam Ennis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Liam Ennis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Liam Ennis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Liam Ennis. Liam Ennis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Hilton, N. Zoe, et al.. (2025). Antisociality in intimate partner violence risk assessment: an analysis of the SARA-V2, SARA-V3, and B-SAFER. Journal of Criminal Psychology. 15(6). 741–753.

Hilton, N. Zoe, et al.. (2023). Predicting Recidivism in a High-Risk Sample of Intimate Partner Violent Men Referred for Police Threat Assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 50(5). 648–665. 3 indexed citations

Nunes, Kevin L., et al.. (2022). Latent class analysis of the heterogeneity of intimate partner violent men: Implications for research and practice.. 10(3). 202–219. 4 indexed citations

Nunes, Kevin L., et al.. (2021). Different perspectives on (un)certainty: challenges, standards, and strategies. Journal of Sexual Aggression. 28(1). 91–102. 1 indexed citations

Hilton, N. Zoe, et al.. (2020). Risk scores and reliability of the SARA, SARA-V3, B-SAFER, and ODARA among Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) cases referred for threat assessment. Police Practice and Research. 22(1). 157–172. 9 indexed citations

Ennis, Liam, et al.. (2018). The active problem solving of patients dependent on home parenteral nutrition: A qualitative analysis. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN. 26. 77–83. 4 indexed citations

Jung, Sandy, et al.. (2017). Can we keep it simple? Using the BARR-2002R with a community-based sex offender sample. Journal of Sexual Aggression. 24(1). 25–36. 3 indexed citations

Ennis, Liam, Warren Mansell, Phil McEvoy, & Sara Tai. (2017). A systematic scoping review and synthesis of dementia and communication theory. Dementia. 18(6). 2261–2281. 6 indexed citations

Jung, Sandy, et al.. (2017). Identifying Criminogenic Needs Using the Personality Assessment Inventory With Males Who Have Sexually Offended. Sexual Abuse. 30(8). 992–1009. 4 indexed citations

10.

Ennis, Liam & Til Wykes. (2015). Sense and readability: Participant information sheets for research studies. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 208(2). 189–194. 29 indexed citations

11.

Jung, Sandy, et al.. (2015). An Evaluation of the Reliability, Construct Validity, and Factor Structure of the Static-2002R. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 61(4). 464–487. 8 indexed citations

12.

Ennis, Liam, et al.. (2015). The integrated threat and risk assessment centre: A program evaluation investigating the implementation of threat management recommendations.. 2(2). 114–126. 6 indexed citations

13.

Ennis, Liam, et al.. (2014). Collaborative development of an electronic Personal Health Record for people with severe and enduring mental health problems. BMC Psychiatry. 14(1). 305–305. 34 indexed citations

14.

Ennis, Liam, Karen Buro, & Sandy Jung. (2014). Identifying Male Sexual Offender Subtypes Using Cluster Analysis and the Static-2002R. Sexual Abuse. 28(5). 403–426. 13 indexed citations

15.

Ennis, Liam & Til Wykes. (2013). Impact of patient involvement in mental health research: longitudinal study. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 203(5). 381–386. 196 indexed citations

16.

Jung, Sandy, et al.. (2013). Measuring the disparity of categorical risk among various sex offender risk assessment measures. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology. 24(3). 353–370. 18 indexed citations

17.

Ennis, Liam, et al.. (2012). Can't surf, won't surf: The digital divide in mental health. Journal of Mental Health. 21(4). 395–403. 96 indexed citations

18.

Ennis, Liam, Diana Rose, Felicity Callard, Mike Denis, & Til Wykes. (2011). Rapid progress or lengthy process? electronic personal health records in mental health. BMC Psychiatry. 11(1). 117–117. 30 indexed citations

19.

Seto, Michael C., et al.. (2003). Detecting Anomalous Sexual Interests in Juvenile Sex Offenders. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 989(1). 118–130. 50 indexed citations

20.

Ennis, Liam, et al.. (2003). . Sexual Abuse. 15(2). 149–157. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact