Liam Convie

460 total citations
11 papers, 248 citations indexed

About

Liam Convie is a scholar working on Surgery, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Liam Convie has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 248 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Surgery, 4 papers in General Health Professions and 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Liam Convie's work include Delphi Technique in Research (3 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (2 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). Liam Convie is often cited by papers focused on Delphi Technique in Research (3 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (2 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). Liam Convie collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Australia. Liam Convie's co-authors include Mike Clarke, Stephen Kirk, Nicola McKinley, William J. Campbell, Scott McCain, Martin Dempster, W. J. Campbell, W D B Clements, Robert Kennedy and Jeffrey Campbell and has published in prestigious journals such as Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, BMJ Open and Postgraduate Medical Journal.

In The Last Decade

Liam Convie

11 papers receiving 244 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Liam Convie United Kingdom 5 156 92 62 29 28 11 248
Scott McCain United Kingdom 6 202 1.3× 121 1.3× 82 1.3× 23 0.8× 12 0.4× 14 299
Wan Yen Lim Singapore 10 130 0.8× 53 0.6× 62 1.0× 33 1.1× 60 2.1× 31 285
Johanna Chan United States 5 142 0.9× 48 0.5× 56 0.9× 35 1.2× 24 0.9× 13 236
Karl Blum Germany 8 324 2.1× 54 0.6× 75 1.2× 51 1.8× 25 0.9× 21 432
Bonnie P. Dumas United States 10 76 0.5× 38 0.4× 79 1.3× 69 2.4× 22 0.8× 22 325
Dana R. Canfield United States 4 229 1.5× 90 1.0× 71 1.1× 17 0.6× 7 0.3× 12 351
Jennifer N. B. Cook United States 8 113 0.7× 61 0.7× 207 3.3× 21 0.7× 13 0.5× 14 333
Andrea Weiss Canada 10 58 0.4× 66 0.7× 102 1.6× 12 0.4× 47 1.7× 19 257
Karen Izquierdo United States 4 259 1.7× 80 0.9× 45 0.7× 14 0.5× 6 0.2× 5 335
Maya S. Iyer United States 8 63 0.4× 50 0.5× 114 1.8× 25 0.9× 7 0.3× 27 242

Countries citing papers authored by Liam Convie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Liam Convie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liam Convie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liam Convie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Liam Convie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liam Convie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liam Convie. The network helps show where Liam Convie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Liam Convie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Liam Convie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Liam Convie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Liam Convie. Liam Convie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
2.
Harji, Deena, Abigail Vallance, Richard Wilkin, et al.. (2024). IMPACT organizational survey highlighting provision of services for patients with locally advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer across Great Britain and Ireland. Colorectal Disease. 26(12). 2033–2038. 1 indexed citations
3.
Convie, Liam, J Clements, Scott McCain, et al.. (2022). Development of a core outcome set for informed consent for therapy: An international key stakeholder consensus study. BMC Medical Ethics. 23(1). 79–79. 4 indexed citations
4.
Convie, Liam, Scott McCain, Nicola McKinley, et al.. (2020). The patient and clinician experience of informed consent for surgery: a systematic review of the qualitative evidence. BMC Medical Ethics. 21(1). 58–58. 38 indexed citations
5.
McKinley, Nicola, Scott McCain, Liam Convie, et al.. (2020). Resilience, burnout and coping mechanisms in UK doctors: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 10(1). e031765–e031765. 112 indexed citations
6.
McKinley, Nicola, et al.. (2019). Resilience in medical doctors: a systematic review. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 95(1121). 140–147. 55 indexed citations
7.
Spence, Robert, et al.. (2018). Renal failure parathyroidectomy – Is pre-operative imaging worthwhile?. The Surgeon. 17(4). 201–206. 3 indexed citations
8.
Convie, Liam, Scott McCain, Jeffrey Campbell, Stephen Kirk, & Mike Clarke. (2018). Evaluating interventions for informed consent for surgery (ICONS): Protocol for the development of a core outcome set. Trials. 19(1). 609–609. 8 indexed citations
9.
Martin, Jennifer K., et al.. (2015). An unusual cause of abdominal distension: intraperitoneal bladder perforation secondary to intermittent self-catheterisation. BMJ Case Reports. 2015. bcr2014207097–bcr2014207097. 3 indexed citations
10.
Convie, Liam, et al.. (2015). The Current Role of Staging Laparoscopy in Oesophagogastric Cancer. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 97(2). 146–150. 21 indexed citations
11.
Hennessey, Derek, et al.. (2012). Paraoesophageal hernia: an overview. British Journal of Hospital Medicine. 73(8). 437–440. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026