Liz Crowe

400 total citations
22 papers, 241 citations indexed

About

Liz Crowe is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Liz Crowe has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 241 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in General Health Professions, 10 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and 7 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Liz Crowe's work include Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (11 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (10 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers). Liz Crowe is often cited by papers focused on Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (11 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (10 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers). Liz Crowe collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Liz Crowe's co-authors include Naomi Hammond, Rosalind Elliott, Jeanine Young, Richard Body, Emily Fitzgerald, Roger Harris, Oliver Flower, Anthony Delaney, David H. Tian and Christopher Wibberley and has published in prestigious journals such as Postgraduate Medical Journal, Emergency Medicine Journal and Journal of Medical Ethics.

In The Last Decade

Liz Crowe

20 papers receiving 238 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Liz Crowe Australia 10 146 109 49 46 26 22 241
Anne Werner Norway 12 128 0.9× 54 0.5× 66 1.3× 65 1.4× 41 1.6× 25 294
Ana María Palmar Santos Spain 8 119 0.8× 163 1.5× 45 0.9× 51 1.1× 16 0.6× 28 318
Kate Lippiett United Kingdom 8 161 1.1× 140 1.3× 22 0.4× 62 1.3× 12 0.5× 18 357
Tara Liberman United States 9 114 0.8× 74 0.7× 51 1.0× 141 3.1× 31 1.2× 18 279
Sameh Eltaybani Japan 10 133 0.9× 68 0.6× 43 0.9× 63 1.4× 13 0.5× 32 284
Salman Barasteh Iran 8 102 0.7× 80 0.7× 26 0.5× 146 3.2× 31 1.2× 33 255
Elena Fernández‐García Spain 9 154 1.1× 129 1.2× 58 1.2× 38 0.8× 12 0.5× 24 293
Farahnaz Abdollahzadeh Iran 9 82 0.6× 69 0.6× 37 0.8× 98 2.1× 36 1.4× 28 297
Francine Buchanan Canada 8 96 0.7× 70 0.6× 28 0.6× 25 0.5× 48 1.8× 31 234
Miki Marutani Japan 5 92 0.6× 125 1.1× 89 1.8× 65 1.4× 14 0.5× 10 252

Countries citing papers authored by Liz Crowe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Liz Crowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liz Crowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liz Crowe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Liz Crowe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liz Crowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liz Crowe. The network helps show where Liz Crowe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Liz Crowe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Liz Crowe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Liz Crowe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Liz Crowe. Liz Crowe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Coyer, Fiona, et al.. (2025). Wellbeing as perceived and experienced by intensive care unit nurses: An interpretive qualitative analysis. Australian Critical Care. 38(3). 101202–101202. 1 indexed citations
2.
Coyer, Fiona, et al.. (2025). Intensive care unit nurses’ understanding and experience of clinical debriefing: A focus group. Australian Critical Care. 38(6). 101439–101439. 2 indexed citations
3.
Coyer, Fiona, et al.. (2025). The impact of clearly defined debriefing practices on nurses working within an adult intensive care: A systematic review. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 88. 103997–103997. 1 indexed citations
4.
Crowe, Liz, et al.. (2025). Debriefing for intensive care unit nurses wellbeing: A hybrid type 2 implementation–effectiveness study. Australian Critical Care. 39(1). 101498–101498.
5.
Keogh, Samantha, et al.. (2024). Proactive debriefing to promote wellbeing in intensive care nurses: A protocol. Australian Critical Care. 37(4). 621–627. 3 indexed citations
6.
Crowe, Liz, Jeanine Young, Anthony C Smith, & Helen M. Haydon. (2023). Factors that may threaten or protect the wellbeing of staff working in paediatric intensive care environments. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 78. 103476–103476. 10 indexed citations
7.
Crowe, Liz, et al.. (2022). Critical care staff wellbeing: A new paradigm for understanding burnout. Australian Critical Care. 36(1). 59–65. 2 indexed citations
8.
Elliott, Rosalind, Liz Crowe, Wendy Pollock, & Naomi Hammond. (2022). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on critical care healthcare professionals' work practices and wellbeing: A qualitative study. Australian Critical Care. 36(1). 44–51. 8 indexed citations
9.
Crowe, Liz, et al.. (2022). Prevalence, features and workplace factors associated with burnout among intensivists in Australia and New Zealand. Critical Care and Resuscitation. 24(3). 280–288. 1 indexed citations
10.
Moynihan, Katie M., Liz Crowe, Helen Irving, et al.. (2021). Ethical climate in contemporary paediatric intensive care. Journal of Medical Ethics. 47(12). e14–e14. 14 indexed citations
11.
Elliott, Rosalind, et al.. (2021). Critical care health professionals’ self-reported needs for wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic: A thematic analysis of survey responses. Australian Critical Care. 35(1). 40–45. 13 indexed citations
12.
Crowe, Liz, et al.. (2021). What is the prevalence and risk factors of burnout among pediatric intensive care staff (PICU)? A review. Translational Pediatrics. 10(10). 2825–2835. 16 indexed citations
13.
Hammond, Naomi, Liz Crowe, Rosalind Elliott, et al.. (2020). Impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on critical care healthcare workers' depression, anxiety, and stress levels. Australian Critical Care. 34(2). 146–154. 70 indexed citations
14.
Wibberley, Christopher, et al.. (2018). How events in emergency medicine impact doctors’ psychological well-being. Emergency Medicine Journal. 35(10). 595–599. 21 indexed citations
15.
Crowe, Liz, et al.. (2018). Outcomes of a wellbeing programme for staff in the PICU. Australian Critical Care. 31(2). 117–118. 2 indexed citations
16.
Crowe, Liz. (2017). Tips on building resilience and improving well-being. Emergency Nurse. 24(10). 14–14.
17.
Carley, Simon, Natalie May, Liz Crowe, et al.. (2017). Social-media-enabled learning in emergency medicine: a case study of the growth, engagement and impact of a free open access medical education blog. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 94(1108). 92–96. 22 indexed citations
18.
Crowe, Liz. (2016). Identifying the risk of compassion fatigue, improving compassion satisfaction and building resilience in emergency medicine. Emergency Medicine Australasia. 28(1). 106–108. 24 indexed citations
19.
Crowe, Liz, et al.. (2015). Advance Care Planning for Older Australians Living in the Community. SAGE Open. 5(2). 5 indexed citations
20.
Bradford, Natalie, Mark Bensink, Helen Irving, et al.. (2012). Paediatric palliative care services in Queensland: an exploration of the barriers, gaps and plans for service development. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 15(1). 2–7. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026