Li Ping
Impact in
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
-
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Papers in
-
- Technology Adoption and User Behaviour 2
- Co-authors
- Min ZhuoChris RyanBin ZhouErwei DongGuopeng LiLinghua KongGuiyuan ZouChunqin Liu
- Journals
- Energy storage materials (1 paper)Tourism Management Perspectives (1 paper)Journal of Affective Disorders (1 paper)Nature Neuroscience (1 paper)Nature (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Li Ping
19 papers receiving 426 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 179
- Physiology 171
- Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 5
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 21
- Social Psychology 57
Countries citing papers authored by Li Ping
This map shows the geographic impact of Li Ping's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Li Ping with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Li Ping more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Li Ping
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Li Ping. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Li Ping. The network helps show where Li Ping may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Li Ping, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 10 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 29 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 26 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 24 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 22 | |
| 16 | Research on the Ethnic Catering Culture Features and Sustainable Development in Western Hunan | 2010 | 1 |
| 17 | 2001 | 49 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1998 | 223 | |
| 20 | 1993 | 1 |
About Li Ping
Li Ping is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Marketing, Physiology, Social Psychology and Language and Linguistics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 437 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (2 papers), Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (2 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (2 papers), Advanced battery technologies research (2 papers) and Urban Green Space and Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (179 citations), Physiology (171 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (5 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (21 citations) and Social Psychology (57 citations). Li Ping has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Min Zhuo, Chris Ryan, Bin Zhou, Erwei Dong, Guopeng Li, Linghua Kong, Guiyuan Zou, Chunqin Liu, Xiaohong Tian and Jianan Sun. Their work appears in journals such as Energy storage materials, Tourism Management Perspectives, Journal of Affective Disorders, Nature Neuroscience and Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.