Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Object-oriented software engineering: a use case driven approach
1992886 citationsLF MarshallInformation and Software Technologyprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of LF Marshall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by LF Marshall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites LF Marshall more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by LF Marshall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by LF Marshall. The network helps show where LF Marshall may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of LF Marshall
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of LF Marshall.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of LF Marshall based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with LF Marshall. LF Marshall is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Devlin, Marie, et al.. (2008). Organised Chaos - Learning Outcomes from trialling Active Learning Methods in Computing Science.1 indexed citations
2.
Devlin, Marie, et al.. (2008). Improving Assessment in Software Engineering Student Team Projects.5 indexed citations
3.
Pitsilis, Georgios & LF Marshall. (2004). Trust as a key to improving Recommendation Systems. School of Computing Science Technical Report Series.2 indexed citations
4.
Marshall, LF, et al.. (2003). Anonymity with Identity Escrow.1 indexed citations
5.
Marshall, LF. (2003). NESS - The Newcastle E-Learning Support System.1 indexed citations
6.
Marshall, LF. (2000). Static Testing Tools for tcl. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).
7.
Marshall, LF. (2000). Some Shadows of Eternity - the Internet and Memorials to the Dead. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).1 indexed citations
8.
Marshall, LF, et al.. (1995). An Efficient Location and Routing Scheme for Mobile Computing Environments.3 indexed citations
9.
Marshall, LF. (1993). Software engineering explained. Information and Software Technology. 35(4). 254–254.11 indexed citations
10.
Marshall, LF. (1992). Object-oriented software engineering: a use case driven approach. Information and Software Technology. 34(12). 825–826.886 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Marshall, LF, et al.. (1985). Reliable Computing in a UNIX United Environment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.