Elliot J. Chikofsky
- Information Systems top 0.5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 2%
- Software top 0.5%
- Computer Networks and Communications top 5%
- Signal Processing top 5%
- Topics
- Software Engineering Research (5 papers)Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (4 papers)Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (3 papers)
- Journals
- Communications of the ACMIEEE SoftwareIEEE Computer Society Press eBooks
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Elliot J. Chikofsky
13 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Information Systems 1.1k
- Artificial Intelligence 641
- Software 555
- Computer Networks and Communications 307
- Signal Processing 105
Countries citing papers authored by Elliot J. Chikofsky
This map shows the geographic impact of Elliot J. Chikofsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elliot J. Chikofsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elliot J. Chikofsky more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elliot J. Chikofsky
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elliot J. Chikofsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elliot J. Chikofsky. The network helps show where Elliot J. Chikofsky may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elliot J. Chikofsky
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elliot J. Chikofsky. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elliot J. Chikofsky based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elliot J. Chikofsky. Elliot J. Chikofsky is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | Proceedings : Third Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, November 8-10, 1996, Monterey, California | 2 |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 38 | |
| 8 | Assessing the State of Tools Assessment | 8 |
| 9 | Fitting Pieces to the Maintenance Puzzle - Guest Editors' Introduction. | 14 |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | Reverse engineering and design recovery: a taxonomybreakdown → | 1228 |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 50 |
About Elliot J. Chikofsky
Elliot J. Chikofsky is a scholar working on Software, Information Systems and Computer Science Applications, having authored 14 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Research (5 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (4 papers) and Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (555 citations), Information Systems (1.1k citations) and Artificial Intelligence (641 citations). Elliot J. Chikofsky has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James H. Cross, Richard C. Waters, Peter G. Selfridge, Ira D. Baxter, Linda Clare and Alex Quilici. Their work appears in journals such as Communications of the ACM, IEEE Software and IEEE Computer Society Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.