Lewis L. Smith

4.9k total citations
107 papers, 3.8k citations indexed

About

Lewis L. Smith is a scholar working on Surgery, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Lewis L. Smith has authored 107 papers receiving a total of 3.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 37 papers in Surgery, 37 papers in Molecular Biology and 28 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Lewis L. Smith's work include Paraquat toxicity studies and treatments (37 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (22 papers) and Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (13 papers). Lewis L. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Paraquat toxicity studies and treatments (37 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (22 papers) and Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (13 papers). Lewis L. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Lewis L. Smith's co-authors include I. Wyatt, Michael S. Rose, Gerald M. Cohen, Edward A. Lock, Ian N.H. White, Peter L. Keeling, Francesco De Matteis, Elizabeth A. Martin, Adrian Davies and W. McLean Provan and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, PLoS ONE and Environmental Health Perspectives.

In The Last Decade

Lewis L. Smith

107 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Peers

Lewis L. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Molecular Biology 1.6k
  • Surgery 1.2k
  • Genetics 714
  • Pharmacology 666
  • Plant Science 489
Replace Dean J. Tuma with:
Dean J. Tuma United States
Hideki Mori Japan
Naoki Yoshimi Japan
Yoichi Konishi Japan
Zhen Jiang China
Kimihiko Satoh Japan
Hideki Wanibuchi Japan
Igor N. Zelko United States
Udayan Apte United States
Bhagavatula Moorthy United States
Dean J. Tuma United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Lewis L. Smith
Lewis L. Smith · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Lewis L. Smith
Lewis L. Smith · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Lewis L. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lewis L. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lewis L. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lewis L. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lewis L. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lewis L. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lewis L. Smith. The network helps show where Lewis L. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lewis L. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lewis L. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lewis L. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lewis L. Smith. Lewis L. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 78
2 36
3 12
4 70
5 19
6 12
7 41
8 74
9 23
10 92
11 101
12 19
13 207
14 26
15 24
16 3
17 7
18 11
19
Changes in transglutaminase activity in an experimental model of pulmonary fibrosis induced by paraquat.
65
20
The accumulation of paraquat by the lung and the relevance of this to the treatment of paraquat poisoning
3

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026