Leslie Speer

1.1k total citations
9 papers, 760 citations indexed

About

Leslie Speer is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Leslie Speer has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 760 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 5 papers in Clinical Psychology and 3 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Leslie Speer's work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (8 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (4 papers) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (2 papers). Leslie Speer is often cited by papers focused on Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (8 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (4 papers) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (2 papers). Leslie Speer collaborates with scholars based in United States, Norway and India. Leslie Speer's co-authors include Elaine Clark, Anne E. Cook, William M. McMahon, Thomas Frazier, Charis Eng, Eric A. Youngstrom, Antonio Y. Hardan, Rebecca Embacher, Robert L. Findling and Paul A. Law and has published in prestigious journals such as PEDIATRICS, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and Autism.

In The Last Decade

Leslie Speer

9 papers receiving 731 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Leslie Speer United States	8	699	285	208	194	153	9	760
Rebecca Chilvers United Kingdom	7	798 1.1×	400 1.4×	260 1.3×	217 1.1×	166 1.1×	8	889
Tia N. Holtzclaw United States	6	541 0.8×	199 0.7×	130 0.6×	106 0.5×	205 1.3×	6	578
Alana Maley United Kingdom	6	645 0.9×	258 0.9×	154 0.7×	259 1.3×	184 1.2×	8	687
Ami Klin United States	8	600 0.9×	212 0.7×	140 0.7×	119 0.6×	237 1.5×	12	686
Mary Beth Steinfeld United States	7	1.1k 1.5×	545 1.9×	407 2.0×	281 1.4×	200 1.3×	7	1.2k
Kasia Chawarska United States	3	632 0.9×	327 1.1×	238 1.1×	153 0.8×	172 1.1×	3	692
Fred Volkmar United States	4	722 1.0×	233 0.8×	166 0.8×	118 0.6×	343 2.2×	7	812
Marko Kielinen Finland	10	1.0k 1.4×	412 1.4×	274 1.3×	331 1.7×	165 1.1×	18	1.1k
Tammy Pilowsky Israel	11	780 1.1×	446 1.6×	214 1.0×	263 1.4×	203 1.3×	11	943
Stacie L. Pozdol United States	5	752 1.1×	291 1.0×	183 0.9×	130 0.7×	228 1.5×	5	798

Countries citing papers authored by Leslie Speer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leslie Speer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leslie Speer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leslie Speer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leslie Speer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leslie Speer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leslie Speer. The network helps show where Leslie Speer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leslie Speer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leslie Speer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leslie Speer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leslie Speer. Leslie Speer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Frazier, Thomas, Robyn M. Busch, Patricia Klaas, et al.. (2023). Development of informant‐report neurobehavioral survey scales for PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome and related neurodevelopmental genetic syndromes. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A. 191(7). 1741–1757. 7 indexed citations

Frazier, Thomas, et al.. (2019). Psychometric evaluation of the revised child and family quality of life questionnaire (CFQL-2). Research in autism spectrum disorders. 70. 101474–101474. 13 indexed citations

Frazier, Thomas, Eric W. Klingemier, Sumit Parikh, et al.. (2018). Development and Validation of Objective and Quantitative Eye Tracking−Based Measures of Autism Risk and Symptom Levels. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 57(11). 858–866. 45 indexed citations

Frazier, Thomas, Eric W. Klingemier, Mary Beukemann, et al.. (2016). Development of an Objective Autism Risk Index Using Remote Eye Tracking. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 55(4). 301–309. 53 indexed citations

Gabrielsen, Terisa P., Megan Farley, Leslie Speer, et al.. (2015). Identifying Autism in a Brief Observation. PEDIATRICS. 135(2). e330–e338. 74 indexed citations

Embacher, Rebecca, et al.. (2015). Development and psychometric evaluation of a psychosocial quality-of-life questionnaire for individuals with autism and related developmental disorders. Autism. 20(7). 832–844. 25 indexed citations

Speer, Leslie. (2012). The Neuropsychology of Autism. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 27(5). 573–574. 26 indexed citations

Frazier, Thomas, Eric A. Youngstrom, Leslie Speer, et al.. (2011). Validation of Proposed DSM-5 Criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 51(1). 28–40.e3. 252 indexed citations

Speer, Leslie, Anne E. Cook, William M. McMahon, & Elaine Clark. (2007). Face processing in children with autism. Autism. 11(3). 265–277. 265 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact