Leslie Irvine
- Genetics top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Geography, Planning and Development top 0.5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Robert GranfieldWilliam CloudPeter N. StearnsDeborah LuptonJesse M. SmithColter EllisArnold ArlukeJack Levin
- Topics
- Human-Animal Interaction Studies (23 papers)Geographies of human-animal interactions (17 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Leslie Irvine
44 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Genetics 525
- Sociology and Political Science 387
- Geography, Planning and Development 357
- General Health Professions 237
- Social Psychology 234
Countries citing papers authored by Leslie Irvine
This map shows the geographic impact of Leslie Irvine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leslie Irvine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leslie Irvine more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Leslie Irvine
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leslie Irvine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leslie Irvine. The network helps show where Leslie Irvine may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leslie Irvine
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leslie Irvine. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leslie Irvine based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leslie Irvine. Leslie Irvine is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 82 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 35 | |
| 10 | Animals in Disasters: Issues for Animal Liberation Activism and Policy | 19 |
| 11 | 60 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | George’s Bulldog: What Mead’s Canine Companion Could Have Told Him about the Self | 9 |
| 14 | 42 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 48 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 13 |
About Leslie Irvine
Leslie Irvine is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Genetics and General Psychology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Animal Interaction Studies (23 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (17 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (357 citations), Genetics (525 citations) and Gender Studies (140 citations). Leslie Irvine has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert Granfield, William Cloud, Peter N. Stearns, Deborah Lupton, Jesse M. Smith, Colter Ellis, Arnold Arluke and Jack Levin. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Social Problems and Gender & Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.