Leslie Forman
- Physiology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Co-authors
- W. Edward CraigheadKate MooreMark I. AppelbaumMelissa A. NapolitanoMichael A. BabyakJames A. BlumenthalParinda KhatriKousik Krishnan
- Topics
- Physical Activity and Health (2 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaSweden
In The Last Decade
Leslie Forman
7 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Physiology 350
- Clinical Psychology 279
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 235
- Psychiatry and Mental health 196
- General Health Professions 139
Countries citing papers authored by Leslie Forman
This map shows the geographic impact of Leslie Forman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leslie Forman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leslie Forman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Leslie Forman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leslie Forman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leslie Forman. The network helps show where Leslie Forman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leslie Forman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leslie Forman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leslie Forman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leslie Forman. Leslie Forman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 120 | |
| 3 | 94 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | Effects of Exercise Training on Older Patients With Major Depressionbreakdown → | 884 |
| 6 | Self-treatment for obsessive compulsive disorder using a manual and a computerized telephone interview: a U.S.-U.K. study. | 40 |
| 7 | 17 |
About Leslie Forman
Leslie Forman is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physical Activity and Health (2 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (96 citations), Biological Psychiatry (43 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (58 citations). Leslie Forman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include W. Edward Craighead, Kate Moore, Mark I. Appelbaum, Melissa A. Napolitano, Michael A. Babyak, James A. Blumenthal, Parinda Khatri, Kousik Krishnan, P. Murali Doraiswamy and Robert Waugh. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Cardiology, Neuro-Oncology and European Neuropsychopharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.