Leonard Lu
Impact in
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Wound Healing and Treatments
- Dermatology top 5%
- Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Papers in
- Surgery 4
- Anesthesia and Pain Management 3
- Nausea and vomiting management 2
- Surgical Sutures and Adhesives 1
-
- Wound Healing and Treatments 3
- Co-authors
- Neil A. Fine (3 shared papers)Nakshatra K. Roy (2 shared papers)Thomas A. Mustoe (4 shared papers)Zol Kryger (3 shared papers)Steven Ledbetter (1 shared paper)Jerome D. Chao (1 shared paper)Alexandrina S. Saulis (1 shared paper)Vinay Rawlani (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (3 papers)Journal of the American College of Surgeons (2 papers)Wound Repair and Regeneration (1 paper)Annals of Plastic Surgery (1 paper)Journal of Surgical Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Leonard Lu
10 papers receiving 411 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Rehabilitation 132
- Dermatology 121
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 54
- Urology 39
- Neurology 70
Countries citing papers authored by Leonard Lu
This map shows the geographic impact of Leonard Lu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leonard Lu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leonard Lu more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Leonard Lu
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leonard Lu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leonard Lu. The network helps show where Leonard Lu may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Leonard Lu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 145 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 65 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 59 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 46 | |
| 5 | 1998 | 31 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 30 | |
| 7 | 1998 | 29 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 1 |
About Leonard Lu
Leonard Lu is a scholar working on Surgery, Rehabilitation, Neurology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Molecular Biology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 429 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wound Healing and Treatments (3 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (3 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (2 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (2 papers), Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence (1 paper), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (1 paper), Hereditary Neurological Disorders (1 paper) and Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (132 citations), Dermatology (121 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (54 citations), Urology (39 citations) and Neurology (70 citations). Leonard Lu has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Neil A. Fine, Nakshatra K. Roy, Thomas A. Mustoe, Zol Kryger, Steven Ledbetter, Jerome D. Chao, Alexandrina S. Saulis, Vinay Rawlani, Tobias Kurth and Giancarlo Logroscino. Their work appears in journals such as Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Wound Repair and Regeneration, Annals of Plastic Surgery and Journal of Surgical Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.