Leo H. de Graaff
- Biotechnology top 0.2%
- Enzyme Production and Characterization 20
- Biomedical Engineering top 1%
- Biofuel production and bioconversion 24
- Horticulture top 5%
- Plant Science top 2%
- Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls 9
- Enzyme-mediated dye degradation 5
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Fungal and yeast genetics research 21
- Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction 10
- Phytochemical compounds biological activities 4
-
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis 3
- Co-authors
- Jaap VisserNoël N. M. E. van PeijRonald P. de VriesMarco M. C. GielkensPaloma ManzanaresAlinda A. HasperEster DekkersRobert L. Mach
- Journals
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology (10 papers)Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (8 papers)Molecular Microbiology (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsAustriaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Leo H. de Graaff
52 papers receiving 3.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Biotechnology 1.3k
- Biomedical Engineering 1.9k
- Horticulture 37
- Plant Science 1.2k
- Molecular Biology 2.1k
Countries citing papers authored by Leo H. de Graaff
This map shows the geographic impact of Leo H. de Graaff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leo H. de Graaff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leo H. de Graaff more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Leo H. de Graaff
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leo H. de Graaff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leo H. de Graaff. The network helps show where Leo H. de Graaff may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Leo H. de Graaff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 14 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 28 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 73 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 88 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 46 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 45 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 39 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 211 | |
| 12 | 2006 | 50 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 70 | |
| 14 | 1999 | 133 | |
| 15 | 1998 | 252 | |
| 16 | 1997 | 98 | |
| 17 | 1996 | 30 | |
| 18 | 1993 | 48 | |
| 19 | 1993 | 62 | |
| 20 | 1988 | 2 |
About Leo H. de Graaff
Leo H. de Graaff is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Horticulture and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 52 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biofuel production and bioconversion (24 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (21 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (20 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (10 papers), Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls (9 papers), Enzyme-mediated dye degradation (5 papers), Phytochemical compounds biological activities (4 papers) and Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (1.3k citations), Biomedical Engineering (1.9k citations) and Horticulture (37 citations). Leo H. de Graaff has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Austria and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jaap Visser, Noël N. M. E. van Peij, Ronald P. de Vries, Marco M. C. Gielkens, Paloma Manzanares, Alinda A. Hasper, Ester Dekkers, Robert L. Mach, José Miguel P. Ferreira de Oliveira and Hetty C. van den Broeck. Their work appears in journals such as Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Molecular Microbiology, Fungal Genetics and Biology and Microbial Cell Factories.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.