Lennart Hofeditz
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Safety Research top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Information Systems top 10%
- Health Informatics top 2%
- Co-authors
- Milad MirbabaieStefan StieglitzAlfred BrendelNicholas FrickBjörn RoßFelix BrünkerChristian EhnisFlorian Brachten
- Topics
- Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (7 papers)Misinformation and Its Impacts (3 papers)AI in Service Interactions (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Lennart Hofeditz
19 papers receiving 330 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Artificial Intelligence 125
- Safety Research 94
- Sociology and Political Science 84
- Information Systems 62
- Health Informatics 53
Countries citing papers authored by Lennart Hofeditz
This map shows the geographic impact of Lennart Hofeditz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lennart Hofeditz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lennart Hofeditz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lennart Hofeditz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lennart Hofeditz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lennart Hofeditz. The network helps show where Lennart Hofeditz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lennart Hofeditz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lennart Hofeditz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lennart Hofeditz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lennart Hofeditz. Lennart Hofeditz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 38 | |
| 8 | 33 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | DO YOU TRUST AN AI-JOURNALIST? A CREDIBILITY ANALYSIS OF NEWS CONTENT WITH AI-AUTHORSHIP | 15 |
| 12 | 72 | |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 36 | |
| 17 | 63 | |
| 18 | Meaningful Use of Social Bots? Possible Applications in Crisis Communication during Disasters. | 17 |
| 19 | Strategies and Influence of Social Bots in a 2017 German state election | 1 |
About Lennart Hofeditz
Lennart Hofeditz is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Safety Research and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 19 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (7 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (3 papers) and AI in Service Interactions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (53 citations), Safety Research (94 citations) and Information Systems and Management (48 citations). Lennart Hofeditz has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Milad Mirbabaie, Stefan Stieglitz, Alfred Brendel, Nicholas Frick, Björn Roß, Felix Brünker, Christian Ehnis, Florian Brachten and Deborah Bunker. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Sustainability and International Journal of Information Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.