Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions
Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Bunker
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Bunker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Bunker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Bunker more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Bunker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Bunker. The network helps show where Deborah Bunker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah Bunker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah Bunker.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah Bunker based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah Bunker. Deborah Bunker is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hofeditz, Lennart, Christian Ehnis, Deborah Bunker, Florian Brachten, & Stefan Stieglitz. (2019). Meaningful Use of Social Bots? Possible Applications in Crisis Communication during Disasters.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.17 indexed citations
Bunker, Deborah, et al.. (2018). When Worlds Collide: Alignment of Information Systems (IS) Incompatibilities Abstract for Effective Disaster Recovery. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.1 indexed citations
Ehnis, Christian & Deborah Bunker. (2013). The Impact of Disaster Typology on Social Media Use by Emergency Services Agencies: The Case of the Boston Marathon Bombing. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.9 indexed citations
9.
Gill, Asif Qumer & Deborah Bunker. (2012). Crowd Sourcing Challenges Assessment Index for Disaster Management. UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney).17 indexed citations
10.
Ehnis, Christian & Deborah Bunker. (2012). Social Media in Disaster Response:Queensland Police Service - Public Engagement During the 2011 Floods. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1–10.30 indexed citations
11.
Gill, Asif Qumer, Deborah Bunker, & Philip Seltsikas. (2012). Evaluating A Communication Technology Assessment Tool (Ctat): A Case Of A Cloud Based Communication Tool. UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney). 88.6 indexed citations
12.
Bunker, Deborah & Stephen Smith. (2009). DISASTER MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNITY WARNING SYSTEMS: INTER-ORGANISATIONAL COLLABORATION AND ICT INNOVATION.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 36.7 indexed citations
13.
Ćećez-Kecmanović, Dubravka, et al.. (2008). Business Strategy Enactment Through An IS: A Sensemaking Approach. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2342–2353.1 indexed citations
14.
Bunker, Deborah, et al.. (2007). Inter-Organizational Systems (IOS) for Supply Chain Management (SCM): A Multi-Perspective Adoption Framework. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 153.3 indexed citations
15.
Gregor, Shirley, et al.. (2007). Australian Eclecticism and Theorizing in Information Systems Research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 19(1). 3.3 indexed citations
16.
Bunker, Deborah, et al.. (2006). What Do We Mean by E-Procurement? - A Private Hospital Perspective in Australia. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 72.3 indexed citations
17.
Smith, Stephen, et al.. (2006). Does Agency Size Affect IS Security Compliance for e-Government?. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 47.2 indexed citations
18.
Kartiwi, Mira, Robert MacGregor, & Deborah Bunker. (2006). Electronic Commerce Adoption Barriers in Indonesian Small Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs): An Exploratory Study. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 230.3 indexed citations
19.
Bunker, Deborah, et al.. (2005). Philosophical Foundations of Information Systems: A Review of the First 10 Years. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 390.2 indexed citations
20.
Andersen, Kim Viborg, Niels Juul, Niels Bjørn‐Andersen, & Deborah Bunker. (2000). Electronic Commerce and Document Interchange: EDI Applications in Denmark. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 607–614.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.