Lene Koch

27 papers receiving 412 citations

Peers

Lene Koch
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Reproductive Medicine 118
  • Geography, Planning and Development 39
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 85
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 125
  • Genetics 113
Replace Mette N. Svendsen with:
Mette N. Svendsen Denmark
Marie Fox United Kingdom
Monica Konrad United Kingdom
Carlos Novas Canada
Mary Anne Warren United States
Peter Glasner United Kingdom
Duana Fullwiley United States
Aditya Bharadwaj Switzerland
Matti Häyry Finland
Alice Dreger United States
Lene Koch relative to Mette N. Svendsen Denmark Mette N. Svendsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mette N. Svendsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lene Koch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lene Koch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lene Koch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lene Koch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lene Koch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lene Koch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lene Koch. The network helps show where Lene Koch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Lene Koch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lene Koch Line = papers co-authored together Lene Koch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200859
2 201350
3 200442
4 200433
5 199432
6 201230
7 201725
8 201022
9 201617
10 201116
11 200216
12 200614
13 201014
14
IVF-AN IRRATIONAL CHOICE?
199014
15 19879
16 20149
17 20088
18 20067
19 20066
20 20096

About Lene Koch

Lene Koch is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Genetics, Physiology, Reproductive Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 28 papers that have together received 453 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (6 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (6 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (5 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (5 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers), Medical History and Research (3 papers), Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration (2 papers) and Geographies of human-animal interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (118 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (39 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (85 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (125 citations) and Genetics (113 citations). Lene Koch has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Mette N. Svendsen, Nete Schwennesen, Dirk Stemerding, Sebastian Mohr, Klaus Hoeyer, Barbara Prainsack, Kathryn Ehrich, Pascale Bourret, Mette Hartlev and Heidelise Als. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, BioSocieties, Science in Context, Scandinavian Journal of History and Social Studies of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact