Lemke Leyman
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 1%
- Neurology top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Co-authors
- Rudi De RaedtEllen GoelevenBruno VerschuèreChris BaekenMarie–Anne VanderhasseltErnst H. W. KosterHugo D’HaenenRik Schacht
- Topics
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (17 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (17 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Lemke Leyman
28 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.1k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 781
- Neurology 510
- Clinical Psychology 321
- Psychiatry and Mental health 204
Countries citing papers authored by Lemke Leyman
This map shows the geographic impact of Lemke Leyman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lemke Leyman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lemke Leyman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lemke Leyman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lemke Leyman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lemke Leyman. The network helps show where Lemke Leyman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lemke Leyman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lemke Leyman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lemke Leyman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lemke Leyman. Lemke Leyman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 20 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 48 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 113 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | Attentional biases for emotional facial stimuli in currently depressed patients with bipolar disorder | 14 |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 113 | |
| 11 | 35 | |
| 12 | 57 | |
| 13 | 34 | |
| 14 | 46 | |
| 15 | 71 | |
| 16 | The Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces: A validation studybreakdown → | 590 |
| 17 | 57 | |
| 18 | 112 | |
| 19 | 43 | |
| 20 | 28 |
About Lemke Leyman
Lemke Leyman is a scholar working on Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (17 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (17 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (510 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (781 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (1.1k citations). Lemke Leyman has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Rudi De Raedt, Ellen Goeleven, Bruno Verschuère, Chris Baeken, Marie–Anne Vanderhasselt, Ernst H. W. Koster, Hugo D’Haenen, Rik Schacht, Evi De Lissnyder and Peter Van Schuerbeek. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Research, Psychological Medicine and Behaviour Research and Therapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.