Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective
20021.0k citationsLeida Chen, Mark L. Gillenson et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Leida Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leida Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leida Chen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leida Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leida Chen. The network helps show where Leida Chen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leida Chen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leida Chen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leida Chen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Leida Chen. Leida Chen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Chen, Leida. (2007). Microstructure and melting property of Sn-2.5Ag-0.7Cu-XGe solder. Transactions of the China Welding Institution.4 indexed citations
10.
Chen, Leida. (2006). A Theoretical Model of Consumer Acceptance of mPayment. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 247.16 indexed citations
11.
Chen, Leida & Justin Tan. (2004). Technology Adaptation in E-Commerce: Key Determinants of Virtual Stores Acceptance. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.20 indexed citations
12.
Chen, Leida & Ravi Nath. (2003). Implementing and Managing Wireless LAN: An Empirical Study. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 10.1 indexed citations
13.
Chen, Leida, et al.. (2003). Wireless Technology Diffusion: An Evaluation Model for Wireless Services. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 252.5 indexed citations
14.
Chen, Leida, et al.. (2003). Small Business Internet Commerce. Information Resources Management Journal. 16(3). 17–41.30 indexed citations
15.
Soliman, Khalid S., Leida Chen, & Mark N. Frolick. (2003). Asps: Do They Work?. Information Systems Management. 20(4). 50–57.12 indexed citations
16.
Frolick, Mark N., et al.. (2001). Emerging Issues in it Certification. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 42(1). 17–20.7 indexed citations
17.
Brunswick, Gary J., et al.. (2001). Mandatory Laptop Computers for All Students: Lessons Learned from the Technology-Learning-Communication (TLC) Initiative at Northern Michigan University. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.
18.
Chen, Leida, Gary J. Brunswick, & Choton Basu. (2000). Electronic Commerce Curricula: An Overview of Current Electronic Commerce Courses and Implications for Marketing Education. Academy of Marketing Studies journal. 4(2). 68.2 indexed citations
Chen, Leida, et al.. (1998). Exploring the Major Issues of Conducting Business on the Internet. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.