Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective
20021.0k citationsLeida Chen, Mark L. Gillenson et al.Information & Managementprofile →
Citations per year, relative to Mark L. Gillenson Mark L. Gillenson (= 1×)
peers
Leo R. Vijayasarathy
Countries citing papers authored by Mark L. Gillenson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark L. Gillenson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark L. Gillenson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark L. Gillenson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark L. Gillenson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark L. Gillenson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark L. Gillenson. The network helps show where Mark L. Gillenson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark L. Gillenson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark L. Gillenson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark L. Gillenson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark L. Gillenson. Mark L. Gillenson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gillenson, Mark L., et al.. (2019). I've Got You Under My Skin: The Past, Present, and Future Use of RFID Technology in People and Animals.. 30. 19–29.7 indexed citations
Zhang, Xihui & Mark L. Gillenson. (2013). WHAT MATTERS AND WHAT DOESN'T: EXAMINING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SURCHARGE POLICIES IN C2C ONLINE AUCTIONS.1 indexed citations
Gillenson, Mark L. & Tom Stafford. (2008). Journal Rakings 2008: A Synthesis of Studies. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 58.5 indexed citations
7.
Gillenson, Mark L. & Frank W. Miller. (2008). Introduction to database management. Wiley eBooks.4 indexed citations
8.
Gillenson, Mark L., et al.. (2007). Introduction to Databases. John Wiley & Sons eBooks.1 indexed citations
9.
Zhang, Xihui, Tao Hu, Brian D. Janz, & Mark L. Gillenson. (2006). Radio Frequency Identification: The Initiator of a Domino Effect. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.3 indexed citations
10.
Chen, Leida, Mark L. Gillenson, & Daniel L. Sherrell. (2004). Consumer acceptance of virtual stores. ACM SIGMIS Database the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems. 35(2). 8–31.169 indexed citations
11.
Stafford, Thomas F. & Mark L. Gillenson. (2003). Mobile commerce. Communications of the ACM. 46(12). 33–34.74 indexed citations
12.
Chen, Leida, Mark L. Gillenson, & Daniel L. Sherrell. (2002). Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective. Information & Management. 39(8). 705–719.1026 indexed citations breakdown →
Gillenson, Mark L. & Robert P. Goldberg. (1984). Strategic planning, systems analysis, and database design: The continuous flow approach.7 indexed citations
20.
Gillenson, Mark L.. (1974). The interactive generation of facial images on a crt using a heuristic strategy.. OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network).14 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.