Lee Congdon
Impact in
-
- European history and politics
- Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics
- Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy
Papers in
-
- Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics 9
- European history and politics 7
-
- Central European national history 3
- German Social Sciences and History 3
- Critical Theory and Philosophy 2
- Global History, Politics, and Ideology 1
- Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Colin Loader (1 shared paper)Mary Gluck (1 shared paper)Randolph L. Braham (1 shared paper)Scott Miller (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (7 papers)Journal of Contemporary History (2 papers)Studies in East European Thought (1 paper)Contemporary European History (1 paper)Slavic Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Lee Congdon
25 papers receiving 141 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Political Science and International Relations 62
- Hepatology 16
- Sociology and Political Science 93
- History 21
- History and Philosophy of Science 8
Countries citing papers authored by Lee Congdon
This map shows the geographic impact of Lee Congdon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lee Congdon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lee Congdon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lee Congdon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lee Congdon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lee Congdon. The network helps show where Lee Congdon may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Lee Congdon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 40 | |
| 2 | 1995 | 31 | |
| 3 | 1986 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 10 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 10 | |
| 6 | 1976 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1990 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1997 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1995 | 4 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1973 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1973 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1991 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1997 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1977 | 2 |
About Lee Congdon
Lee Congdon is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, History, Philosophy and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 35 papers that have together received 182 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (9 papers), European history and politics (7 papers), Central European national history (3 papers), German Social Sciences and History (3 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (2 papers), Global History, Politics, and Ideology (1 paper), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (1 paper) and French Historical and Cultural Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (62 citations), Hepatology (16 citations), Sociology and Political Science (93 citations), History (21 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (8 citations). Lee Congdon has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Colin Loader, Mary Gluck, Randolph L. Braham and Scott Miller. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of Contemporary History, Studies in East European Thought, Contemporary European History and Slavic Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.