Leander Tentrup

841 total citations
10 papers, 80 citations indexed

About

Leander Tentrup is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence and Computer Networks and Communications. According to data from OpenAlex, Leander Tentrup has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 80 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics, 6 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 5 papers in Computer Networks and Communications. Recurrent topics in Leander Tentrup's work include Formal Methods in Verification (7 papers), Distributed systems and fault tolerance (4 papers) and Logic, programming, and type systems (3 papers). Leander Tentrup is often cited by papers focused on Formal Methods in Verification (7 papers), Distributed systems and fault tolerance (4 papers) and Logic, programming, and type systems (3 papers). Leander Tentrup collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Leander Tentrup's co-authors include Markus N. Rabe, Bernd Finkbeiner, Christopher Hahn, Roderick Bloem, Robert Könighofer, Martina Seidl, Adam K. Walker, Ocan Sankur, Swen Jacobs and Rüdiger Ehlers and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Acta Informatica and Formal Methods in System Design.

In The Last Decade

Leander Tentrup

10 papers receiving 76 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Leander Tentrup Germany	5	59	50	25	19	10	10	80
Ayrat Khalimov Austria	4	52 0.9×	35 0.7×	22 0.9×	29 1.5×	6 0.6×	7	68
Fabian Emmes Germany	4	58 1.0×	66 1.3×	28 1.1×	11 0.6×	13 1.3×	4	84
Emmanuel Filiot Belgium	6	94 1.6×	85 1.7×	31 1.2×	13 0.7×	7 0.7×	28	120
Andrei Paskevich France	5	33 0.6×	46 0.9×	11 0.4×	10 0.5×	12 1.2×	12	58
Sascha Böhme Germany	6	72 1.2×	97 1.9×	11 0.4×	10 0.5×	11 1.1×	8	106
Naiyong Jin China	5	50 0.8×	40 0.8×	34 1.4×	11 0.6×	13 1.3×	11	70
François Bobot France	5	37 0.6×	40 0.8×	19 0.8×	13 0.7×	7 0.7×	7	60
Jules Villard United Kingdom	5	61 1.0×	78 1.6×	17 0.7×	22 1.2×	13 1.3×	11	90
Hongfei Fu China	5	58 1.0×	70 1.4×	25 1.0×	9 0.5×	5 0.5×	14	84
Jens Chr. Godskesen Denmark	6	46 0.8×	43 0.9×	21 0.8×	14 0.7×	6 0.6×	18	67

Countries citing papers authored by Leander Tentrup

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leander Tentrup's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leander Tentrup with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leander Tentrup more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leander Tentrup

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leander Tentrup. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leander Tentrup. The network helps show where Leander Tentrup may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leander Tentrup

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leander Tentrup. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leander Tentrup based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leander Tentrup. Leander Tentrup is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Finkbeiner, Bernd, et al.. (2020). Efficient monitoring of hyperproperties using prefix trees. International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer. 22(6). 729–740. 3 indexed citations

2.

Finkbeiner, Bernd, et al.. (2019). Synthesis from hyperproperties. Acta Informatica. 57(1-2). 137–163. 4 indexed citations

3.

Finkbeiner, Bernd, et al.. (2019). Monitoring hyperproperties. Formal Methods in System Design. 54(3). 336–363. 14 indexed citations

4.

Tentrup, Leander. (2019). CAQE and QuAbS: Abstraction Based QBF Solvers. 11(1). 155–210. 2 indexed citations

5.

Finkbeiner, Bernd, et al.. (2018). RVHyper: A Runtime Verification Tool for Temporal Hyperproperties. Figshare. 194–200. 3 indexed citations

6.

Jacobs, Swen, Roderick Bloem, Romain Brenguier, et al.. (2016). The first reactive synthesis competition (SYNTCOMP 2014). International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer. 19(3). 367–390. 13 indexed citations

7.

Jacobs, Swen, Roderick Bloem, Romain Brenguier, et al.. (2016). The 3rd Reactive Synthesis Competition (SYNTCOMP 2016): Benchmarks, Participants & Results. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 229. 149–177. 3 indexed citations

8.

Tentrup, Leander, et al.. (2016). Approximating Optimal Bounds in Prompt-LTL Realizability in Doubly-exponential Time. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 226. 302–315. 1 indexed citations

9.

Finkbeiner, Bernd & Leander Tentrup. (2015). Detecting Unrealizability of Distributed Fault-tolerant Systems. Logical Methods in Computer Science. Volume 11, Issue 3. 4 indexed citations

10.

Rabe, Markus N. & Leander Tentrup. (2015). CAQE: A Certifying QBF Solver. 136–143. 33 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact