Swen Jacobs
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Software top 10%
- Computer Networks and Communications
- Hardware and Architecture
- Co-authors
- Roderick BloemAyrat KhalimovIgor KonnovRüdiger EhlersRobert KönighoferJosef WidderSasha RubinHelmut Veith
- Topics
- Formal Methods in Verification (16 papers)Logic, programming, and type systems (7 papers)Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (6 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaComputers in Biology and MedicineLecture notes in computer science
- Partner nations
- GermanyAustriaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Swen Jacobs
19 papers receiving 142 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 19
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 122
- Artificial Intelligence 74
- Software 53
- Computer Networks and Communications 41
- Hardware and Architecture 19
Countries citing papers authored by Swen Jacobs
This map shows the geographic impact of Swen Jacobs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Swen Jacobs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Swen Jacobs more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Swen Jacobs
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Swen Jacobs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Swen Jacobs. The network helps show where Swen Jacobs may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Swen Jacobs
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Swen Jacobs. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Swen Jacobs based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Swen Jacobs. Swen Jacobs is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | On Complete Reasoning about Axiomatic Specifications | 1 |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Swen Jacobs
Swen Jacobs is a scholar working on Software, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Hardware and Architecture, having authored 21 papers that have together received 145 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Formal Methods in Verification (16 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (7 papers) and Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (53 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (122 citations) and Hardware and Architecture (19 citations). Swen Jacobs has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United States. Frequent co-authors include Roderick Bloem, Ayrat Khalimov, Igor Konnov, Rüdiger Ehlers, Robert Könighofer, Josef Widder, Sasha Rubin, Helmut Veith, Viktor Kunčak and Martina Seidl. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Computers in Biology and Medicine and Lecture notes in computer science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.