Le Vy Phan

599 total citations
9 papers, 238 citations indexed

About

Le Vy Phan is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Applied Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Le Vy Phan has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 238 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Clinical Psychology, 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Applied Psychology. Recurrent topics in Le Vy Phan's work include Personality Traits and Psychology (7 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers). Le Vy Phan is often cited by papers focused on Personality Traits and Psychology (7 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers). Le Vy Phan collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Le Vy Phan's co-authors include John F. Rauthmann, Niclas Kuper, Eranda Jayawickreme, Laura E. R. Blackie, Corinne E. Zachry, Brenton M. Wiernik, Dorothee Mischkowski, Manfred Schmitt, Karl‐Heinz Renner and Malika Ihle and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, PLoS ONE and The Journals of Gerontology Series B.

In The Last Decade

Le Vy Phan

7 papers receiving 235 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Le Vy Phan Germany	6	150	104	73	45	38	9	238
Dunigan Parker Folk Canada	6	124 0.8×	122 1.2×	30 0.4×	41 0.9×	31 0.8×	15	226
Alexander Danvers United States	9	65 0.4×	100 1.0×	107 1.5×	61 1.4×	32 0.8×	16	256
Jeroen Borghuis Netherlands	4	146 1.0×	73 0.7×	95 1.3×	33 0.7×	30 0.8×	5	260
Julia Krasko Germany	7	89 0.6×	91 0.9×	52 0.7×	53 1.2×	31 0.8×	12	209
Sarah Kritzler Germany	6	91 0.6×	64 0.6×	42 0.6×	54 1.2×	29 0.8×	11	186
Bryant M. Stone United States	7	100 0.7×	63 0.6×	46 0.6×	31 0.7×	41 1.1×	34	212
Natalia Bezerra Dutra Brazil	8	93 0.6×	63 0.6×	36 0.5×	52 1.2×	20 0.5×	12	252
Jiaxu Zhao China	9	202 1.3×	145 1.4×	33 0.5×	31 0.7×	27 0.7×	20	300
Magdalena Śmieja Poland	8	117 0.8×	125 1.2×	70 1.0×	27 0.6×	24 0.6×	14	210
Ricardo M. Tamayo Colombia	6	90 0.6×	49 0.5×	35 0.5×	26 0.6×	19 0.5×	16	209

Countries citing papers authored by Le Vy Phan

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Le Vy Phan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Le Vy Phan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Le Vy Phan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Le Vy Phan

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Le Vy Phan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Le Vy Phan. The network helps show where Le Vy Phan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Le Vy Phan

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Le Vy Phan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Le Vy Phan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Le Vy Phan. Le Vy Phan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Gärtner, Anne, et al.. (2025). Responsible Research Assessment I: Implementing DORA and CoARA for hiring and promotion in psychology. 9.

2.

Phan, Le Vy, et al.. (2025). Personality psychology is getting personal: Advancing the field through personalization. European Journal of Personality. 40(2). 435–455. 1 indexed citations

3.

Phan, Le Vy, Niclas Kuper, Nadin Beckmann, et al.. (2024). Beyond nomothetics and idiographics: Towards a systematization of personality research approaches. European Journal of Personality. 39(2). 233–253.

4.

Kuper, Niclas, et al.. (2023). Distinguishing four types of Person × Situation interactions: An integrative framework and empirical examination.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 126(2). 282–311. 12 indexed citations

5.

Kuper, Niclas, et al.. (2021). The dynamics, processes, mechanisms, and functioning of personality: An overview of the field. British Journal of Psychology. 112(1). 1–51. 37 indexed citations

6.

Kuper, Niclas, et al.. (2021). The situation during the COVID-19 pandemic: A snapshot in Germany. PLoS ONE. 16(2). e0245719–e0245719. 6 indexed citations

7.

Phan, Le Vy & John F. Rauthmann. (2021). Personality computing: New frontiers in personality assessment. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 15(7). 51 indexed citations

8.

Phan, Le Vy, et al.. (2020). Who Is Impacted? Personality Predicts Individual Differences in Psychological Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 12(6). 1110–1130. 83 indexed citations

9.

Zachry, Corinne E., Le Vy Phan, Laura E. R. Blackie, & Eranda Jayawickreme. (2018). Situation-Based Contingencies Underlying Wisdom-Content Manifestations: Examining Intellectual Humility in Daily Life. The Journals of Gerontology Series B. 73(8). 1404–1415. 48 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact