Lawrence Lee

4.7k total citations · 2 hit papers
83 papers, 3.1k citations indexed

About

Lawrence Lee is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Lawrence Lee has authored 83 papers receiving a total of 3.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 69 papers in Surgery, 36 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 17 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Lawrence Lee's work include Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (35 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (34 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (12 papers). Lawrence Lee is often cited by papers focused on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (35 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (34 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (12 papers). Lawrence Lee collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Lawrence Lee's co-authors include Liane S. Feldman, Larry R. Kaiser, John C. Kucharczuk, Sunil Singhal, M. Blair Marshall, Gerald M. Fried, Clayton J. Brinster, Patrick Charlebois, A. Sender Liberman and Julio F. Fiore and has published in prestigious journals such as Gastroenterology, PLoS ONE and Annals of Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Lawrence Lee

79 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Hit Papers

Prehabilitation versus Rehabilitation 2004 2026 2011 2018 2014 2004 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Lawrence Lee Canada 27 2.4k 1.1k 794 698 506 83 3.1k
Gerrit D. Slooter Netherlands 28 1.3k 0.5× 492 0.5× 398 0.5× 1.4k 2.0× 474 0.9× 100 2.6k
Tarik Sammour Australia 32 2.3k 1.0× 873 0.8× 625 0.8× 1.3k 1.8× 236 0.5× 164 3.1k
Chelsia Gillis Canada 30 2.4k 1.0× 1.6k 1.5× 401 0.5× 1.3k 1.9× 1.6k 3.2× 77 4.0k
Barry Stein Canada 26 2.0k 0.8× 1.5k 1.4× 310 0.4× 1.1k 1.6× 968 1.9× 50 3.2k
Julio F. Fiore Canada 31 1.9k 0.8× 1.4k 1.3× 681 0.9× 758 1.1× 687 1.4× 110 3.1k
Joseph R. Schneider United States 34 3.6k 1.5× 1.2k 1.1× 2.2k 2.8× 439 0.6× 236 0.5× 102 4.9k
Jerome H. Liu United States 17 991 0.4× 543 0.5× 425 0.5× 987 1.4× 121 0.2× 23 2.5k
Rashami Awasthi Canada 25 1.8k 0.8× 1.3k 1.2× 342 0.4× 1.4k 2.0× 1.3k 2.7× 32 3.2k
Belinda Lees United Kingdom 34 1.4k 0.6× 1.2k 1.1× 1.2k 1.6× 556 0.8× 638 1.3× 85 4.9k
Eva Angenete Sweden 31 3.0k 1.2× 496 0.5× 628 0.8× 2.8k 4.1× 204 0.4× 144 4.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Lawrence Lee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lawrence Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lawrence Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lawrence Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lawrence Lee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lawrence Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lawrence Lee. The network helps show where Lawrence Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lawrence Lee

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lawrence Lee. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lawrence Lee based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lawrence Lee. Lawrence Lee is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Rajabiyazdi, Fateme, Saba Balvardi, Natasha Barone, et al.. (2022). S110—Opioid-free analgesia after outpatient general surgery: A qualitative study focused on the perspectives of patients and clinicians involved in a pilot trial. Surgical Endoscopy. 37(3). 2269–2280. 2 indexed citations
3.
Kaneva, Pepa, et al.. (2022). At least ninety days of follow-up are required to adequately detect wound outcomes after open incisional hernia repair. Surgical Endoscopy. 36(11). 8463–8471. 4 indexed citations
4.
Liberman, A. Sender, Patrick Charlebois, B. Stein, et al.. (2022). Trajectory of change of low anterior resection syndrome over time after restorative proctectomy for rectal adenocarcinoma. Techniques in Coloproctology. 26(3). 195–203. 10 indexed citations
5.
Liberman, A. Sender, Patrick Charlebois, B. Stein, et al.. (2022). The impact of bowel dysfunction on health-related quality of life after rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review. Techniques in Coloproctology. 26(7). 515–527. 27 indexed citations
7.
Kaneva, Pepa, Gerald M. Fried, Kosar Khwaja, et al.. (2020). S116: Impact of incisional negative pressure wound therapy on surgical site infection after complex incisional hernia repair: a retrospective matched cohort study. Surgical Endoscopy. 35(7). 3949–3960. 11 indexed citations
8.
Lee, Lawrence, et al.. (2019). National Quality Forum (NQF). StatPearls. 2 indexed citations
9.
Lee, Lawrence & Katherine M. McKendy. (2018). Management of Trauma to the Rectum and Anus. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 61(11). 1245–1248. 2 indexed citations
10.
Lee, Lawrence & Liane S. Feldman. (2018). Enhanced Recovery After Surgery. Surgical Clinics of North America. 98(6). 1137–1148. 15 indexed citations
11.
Ferri, Lorenzo, et al.. (2018). Enhanced recovery after pulmonary surgery. Journal of Thoracic Disease. 10(S32). S3755–S3755. 9 indexed citations
12.
Fiore, Julio F., Sabrina Figueiredo, Saba Balvardi, et al.. (2017). How Do We Value Postoperative Recovery?. Annals of Surgery. 267(4). 656–669. 52 indexed citations
13.
Lee, Lawrence, Maria Abou-Khalil, Sender Liberman, et al.. (2017). Incidence of incisional hernia in the specimen extraction site for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgical Endoscopy. 31(12). 5083–5093. 83 indexed citations
14.
Lee, Lawrence, et al.. (2015). How well are we measuring postoperative “recovery” after abdominal surgery?. Quality of Life Research. 24(11). 2583–2590. 34 indexed citations
15.
Fiore, Julio F., Petru Niculiseanu, Tara Landry, et al.. (2015). Systematic review of the influence of enhanced recovery pathways in elective lung resection. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 151(3). 708–715.e6. 84 indexed citations
16.
Lee, Lawrence, Juan Mata, Berson Augustin, et al.. (2014). A comparison of the validity of two indirect utility instruments as measures of postoperative recovery. Journal of Surgical Research. 190(1). 79–86. 17 indexed citations
17.
Lee, Lawrence, Ulrich Ronellenfitsch, Wayne L. Hofstetter, et al.. (2013). Predicting Lymph Node Metastases in Early Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Using a Simple Scoring System. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 217(2). 191–199. 62 indexed citations
18.
Lee, Lawrence, Tung Thanh Tran, Nancy E. Mayo, Franco Carli, & Liane S. Feldman. (2013). What does it really mean to “recover” from an operation?. Surgery. 155(2). 211–216. 144 indexed citations
19.
Atoui, Rony, Lawrence Lee, & Lorenzo Ferri. (2008). An unusual case of a strangulated lung hernia after an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 138(2). 495–496. 1 indexed citations
20.
Brinster, Clayton J., Sunil Singhal, Lawrence Lee, et al.. (2004). Evolving options in the management of esophageal perforation. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 77(4). 1475–1483. 521 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026