Lawrence F. Barmann
- History top 5%
- Catholicism and Religious Studies 4
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 2
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes 2
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 6
-
- Historical Economic and Social Studies 2
-
- Religion and Society Interactions 2
-
- Religious Tourism and Spaces 2
-
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology 1
- Co-authors
- Morris BermanDermot KeoghChristopher Kent
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (5 papers)Church History (2 papers)Journal of British Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
Lawrence F. Barmann
13 papers receiving 97 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- History and Philosophy of Science 34
- History 34
- General Psychology 3
- Anthropology 14
- Political Science and International Relations 27
Countries citing papers authored by Lawrence F. Barmann
This map shows the geographic impact of Lawrence F. Barmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lawrence F. Barmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lawrence F. Barmann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lawrence F. Barmann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lawrence F. Barmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lawrence F. Barmann. The network helps show where Lawrence F. Barmann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Lawrence F. Barmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 3 | Sanctity and secularity during the modernist period : six perspectives on hagiography around 1900 | 1999 | 0 |
| 4 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 17 | |
| 6 | 1993 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1990 | 0 | |
| 8 | 1990 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1987 | 18 | |
| 10 | 1985 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1979 | 6 | |
| 12 | 1979 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1979 | 56 | |
| 14 | 1978 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1978 | 13 | |
| 16 | 1977 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1976 | 1 | |
| 18 | Baron Friedrich von Hügel and the Modernist Crisis in England | 1972 | 8 |
| 19 | 1968 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1964 | 0 |
About Lawrence F. Barmann
Lawrence F. Barmann is a scholar working on History, Religious studies, Geography, Planning and Development, Classics and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 23 papers that have together received 141 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (6 papers), Catholicism and Religious Studies (4 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (2 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers), Religious Tourism and Spaces (2 papers) and Medieval Philosophy and Theology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (34 citations), History (34 citations), General Psychology (3 citations), Anthropology (14 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (27 citations). Lawrence F. Barmann has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Morris Berman, Dermot Keogh and Christopher Kent. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Church History, Journal of British Studies, The Catholic historical review and Thought.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.