Laurie Elit

7.1k citations
143 papers · 3.6k indexed · h-index 32

Laurie Elit

140 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers

Laurie Elit
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Reproductive Medicine 1.4k
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 1.2k
  • Oncology 874
  • Emergency Medical Services 163
  • Cancer Research 265
Replace J. Michael Straughn with:
J. Michael Straughn United States
Annekathryn Goodman United States
Sarah M. Temkin United States
Carol L. Brown United States
Marcela G. del Carmen United States
Joanna M. Cain United States
Robert Giuntoli United States
Nancy C. Lee United States
Amanda N. Fader United States
Stephanie V. Blank United States
Laurie Elit relative to J. Michael Straughn United States J. Michael Straughn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
J. Michael Straughn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Laurie Elit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laurie Elit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laurie Elit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laurie Elit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laurie Elit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laurie Elit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laurie Elit. The network helps show where Laurie Elit may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Laurie Elit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Laurie Elit Line = papers co-authored together Laurie Elit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 20237
3 20224
4 20228
5 201713
6 20165
7 201520
8
Sociodemographic factors associated with cervical cancer screening and follow-up of abnormal results.
201231
9 201220
10 201114
11
What we know about treatment decision making in ovarian cancer
20102
12 20102
13
“Playing God because you have to”: Canadian health professionals’ experiences of rationing care in humanitarian and development work
20105
14 201071
15 201027
16 200897
17 200618
18 20003
19 20005
20 199838

About Laurie Elit

Laurie Elit is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Oncology, having authored 143 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (54 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (53 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (40 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (16 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (15 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (13 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (12 papers) and BRCA gene mutations in cancer (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (1.4k citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (1.2k citations) and Oncology (874 citations). Laurie Elit has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Cameroon. Frequent co-authors include Michael Fung‐Kee‐Fung, Amit M. Oza, Hal W. Hirte, Kristina Trim, Jason Dodge, Anthony Fyles, Himu Lukka, Alice Lytwyn, Tom Oliver and Clare J. Reade. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026