Laurence Williams

481 total citations
12 papers, 335 citations indexed

About

Laurence Williams is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science and Building and Construction. According to data from OpenAlex, Laurence Williams has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 335 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Building and Construction. Recurrent topics in Laurence Williams's work include Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (7 papers), Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy (4 papers) and Mining and Resource Management (3 papers). Laurence Williams is often cited by papers focused on Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (7 papers), Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy (4 papers) and Mining and Resource Management (3 papers). Laurence Williams collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and Hungary. Laurence Williams's co-authors include Benjamin K. Sovacool, Sarah Curtis, Phil Macnaghten, Richard J. Davies, Timothy J. Foxon, William F. Lamb, Lina Brand-Correa, Finn Müller-Hansen, Jan C. Minx and Michael Jakob and has published in prestigious journals such as Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Energy Policy and Global Environmental Change.

In The Last Decade

Laurence Williams

10 papers receiving 319 citations

Peers

Laurence Williams
Henk‐Jan Kooij Netherlands
Shane Fudge United Kingdom
Julie MacArthur New Zealand
Imogen Rattle United Kingdom
Margaret Tingey United Kingdom
Laurence Williams
Citations per year, relative to Laurence Williams Laurence Williams (= 1×) peers Bente Johnsen Rygg

Countries citing papers authored by Laurence Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laurence Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laurence Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laurence Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laurence Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laurence Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laurence Williams. The network helps show where Laurence Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laurence Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laurence Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laurence Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laurence Williams. Laurence Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Williams, Laurence, et al.. (2025). Plausibility, Acceptability, and Trustworthiness: The Resonance of Shale Gas Frames in the United Kingdom. Environmental Communication. 19(4). 783–818.
2.
Williams, Laurence. (2024). Expect the unimaginable: A document analysis of expectations for 5G in UK newspapers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 209. 123762–123762.
3.
Williams, Laurence. (2023). Lessons from the Framing Contest over UK Shale Development. Nature and Culture. 18(1). 42–64. 1 indexed citations
4.
Williams, Laurence, Benjamin K. Sovacool, & Timothy J. Foxon. (2022). The energy use implications of 5G: Reviewing whole network operational energy, embodied energy, and indirect effects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 157. 112033–112033. 55 indexed citations
5.
Bradshaw, Michael, Patrick Devine‐Wright, Darrick Evensen, et al.. (2022). ‘We're going all out for shale:’ explaining shale gas energy policy failure in the United Kingdom. Energy Policy. 168. 113132–113132. 11 indexed citations
6.
Williams, Laurence & Noam Bergman. (2022). Koomey's law forevermore? A document analysis of the production and circulation of the promise of ‘green 5G’. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 187. 122193–122193. 5 indexed citations
7.
Williams, Laurence & Benjamin K. Sovacool. (2020). Energy democracy, dissent and discourse in the party politics of shale gas in the United Kingdom. Environmental Politics. 29(7). 1239–1263. 29 indexed citations
8.
Lamb, William F., Miklós Antal, Katharina Bohnenberger, et al.. (2020). What are the social outcomes of climate policies? A systematic map and review of the ex-post literature. Environmental Research Letters. 15(11). 113006–113006. 73 indexed citations
9.
Sovacool, Benjamin K., et al.. (2020). Humanizing hydrocarbon frontiers: the “lived experience” of shale gas fracking in the United Kingdom’s Fylde communities. Local Environment. 25(11-12). 944–966. 11 indexed citations
10.
Williams, Laurence & Benjamin K. Sovacool. (2019). The discursive politics of ‘fracking’: Frames, storylines, and the anticipatory contestation of shale gas development in the United Kingdom. Global Environmental Change. 58. 101935–101935. 35 indexed citations
11.
Williams, Laurence, Phil Macnaghten, Richard J. Davies, & Sarah Curtis. (2015). Framing ‘fracking’: Exploring public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing in the United Kingdom. Public Understanding of Science. 26(1). 89–104. 114 indexed citations
12.
Williams, Laurence. (1968). PETROLEUM EXPLORATION OUTLOOK FOR 1968. The APEA Journal. 8(2). 22–25. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026