James Gaede

477 total citations
10 papers, 299 citations indexed

About

James Gaede is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Pollution and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, James Gaede has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 299 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 4 papers in Pollution and 3 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. Recurrent topics in James Gaede's work include Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy (6 papers), Energy and Environment Impacts (4 papers) and Environmental Education and Sustainability (3 papers). James Gaede is often cited by papers focused on Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy (6 papers), Energy and Environment Impacts (4 papers) and Environmental Education and Sustainability (3 papers). James Gaede collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Switzerland. James Gaede's co-authors include Ian Rowlands, James Meadowcroft, Jim Watson, Florian Kern, Christopher R. Jones, Mark Winfield, Peter E.D. Love and Peter Hilpert and has published in prestigious journals such as Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Energy Research & Social Science and Energy Reports.

In The Last Decade

James Gaede

10 papers receiving 284 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James Gaede Canada 9 148 85 72 55 48 10 299
Johanna Höffken Netherlands 10 162 1.1× 130 1.5× 130 1.8× 118 2.1× 42 0.9× 16 395
Dörte Ohlhorst Germany 11 154 1.0× 139 1.6× 63 0.9× 94 1.7× 33 0.7× 18 394
Georgios Xexakis Greece 13 101 0.7× 88 1.0× 35 0.5× 113 2.1× 52 1.1× 28 381
Maria Rosaria Di Nucci Germany 13 268 1.8× 140 1.6× 113 1.6× 158 2.9× 52 1.1× 24 501
Katja Pietzner Germany 7 154 1.0× 43 0.5× 50 0.7× 93 1.7× 56 1.2× 15 335
Sara Heidenreich Norway 9 228 1.5× 171 2.0× 123 1.7× 101 1.8× 57 1.2× 19 415
Julia Kirch Kirkegaard Denmark 11 160 1.1× 106 1.2× 34 0.5× 77 1.4× 20 0.4× 29 334
Alessandro Sciullo Italy 10 104 0.7× 87 1.0× 76 1.1× 91 1.7× 23 0.5× 21 280
Mark Winfield Canada 10 68 0.5× 48 0.6× 32 0.4× 77 1.4× 45 0.9× 25 272
Andrzej Ceglarz Germany 7 177 1.2× 156 1.8× 84 1.2× 160 2.9× 28 0.6× 13 403

Countries citing papers authored by James Gaede

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Gaede's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Gaede with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Gaede more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Gaede

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Gaede. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Gaede. The network helps show where James Gaede may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Gaede

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Gaede. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Gaede based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Gaede. James Gaede is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Jones, Christopher R., Peter Hilpert, James Gaede, & Ian Rowlands. (2021). Batteries, compressed air, flywheels, or pumped hydro? Exploring public attitudes towards grid-scale energy storage technologies in Canada and the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science. 80. 102228–102228. 11 indexed citations
2.
3.
Gaede, James & Ian Rowlands. (2019). The value of multiple perspectives. Energy Research & Social Science. 48. 262–268. 5 indexed citations
4.
Gaede, James, et al.. (2019). From utility demand side management to low-carbon transitions: Opportunities and challenges for energy efficiency governance in a new era. Energy Research & Social Science. 59. 101312–101312. 35 indexed citations
5.
Gaede, James & Ian Rowlands. (2018). How ‘transformative’ is energy storage? Insights from stakeholder perceptions in Ontario. Energy Research & Social Science. 44. 268–277. 13 indexed citations
6.
Gaede, James, et al.. (2018). Hot off the press! A comparative media analysis of energy storage framing in Canadian newspapers. Energy Research & Social Science. 46. 155–168. 17 indexed citations
7.
Gaede, James & Ian Rowlands. (2018). Visualizing social acceptance research. Energy Research & Social Science. 40. 142–158. 101 indexed citations
8.
Jones, Christopher R., et al.. (2018). Understanding lay-public perceptions of energy storage technologies: Results of a questionnaire conducted in the UK. Energy Procedia. 151. 135–143. 22 indexed citations
9.
Gaede, James & James Meadowcroft. (2015). A Question of Authenticity: Status Quo Bias and the International Energy Agency's World Energy Outlook. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. 18(5). 608–627. 36 indexed citations
10.
Kern, Florian, James Gaede, James Meadowcroft, & Jim Watson. (2015). The political economy of carbon capture and storage: An analysis of two demonstration projects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 102. 250–260. 47 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026