Lauren Hanson
About
In The Last Decade
Lauren Hanson
7 papers receiving 170 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Genetics 45
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 38
- Oncology 38
- Sociology and Political Science 36
- Safety Research 29
Countries citing papers authored by Lauren Hanson
This map shows the geographic impact of Lauren Hanson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lauren Hanson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lauren Hanson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lauren Hanson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lauren Hanson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lauren Hanson. The network helps show where Lauren Hanson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lauren Hanson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lauren Hanson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lauren Hanson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lauren Hanson. Lauren Hanson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 56 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 29 | |
| 5 | 29 | |
| 6 | Algorithmic accountability: a primer | 50 |
| 7 | 5 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.