Johnna R. Swartz
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 2%
- Co-authors
- Ahmad R. HaririChristopher S. MonkDouglas E. WilliamsonBruce L. MillerAnnchen R. KnodtJillian Lee WigginsMelisa CarrascoIra M. Lesser
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (16 papers)Stress Responses and Cortisol (11 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomBrazil
In The Last Decade
Johnna R. Swartz
46 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Clinical Psychology 649
- Cognitive Neuroscience 588
- Psychiatry and Mental health 409
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 318
- Behavioral Neuroscience 275
Countries citing papers authored by Johnna R. Swartz
This map shows the geographic impact of Johnna R. Swartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johnna R. Swartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johnna R. Swartz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Johnna R. Swartz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johnna R. Swartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johnna R. Swartz. The network helps show where Johnna R. Swartz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Johnna R. Swartz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Johnna R. Swartz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Johnna R. Swartz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Johnna R. Swartz. Johnna R. Swartz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 57 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 41 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 18 | |
| 19 | 110 | |
| 20 | 31 |
About Johnna R. Swartz
Johnna R. Swartz is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Biological Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (16 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (11 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (275 citations), Biological Psychiatry (165 citations) and Clinical Psychology (649 citations). Johnna R. Swartz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Ahmad R. Hariri, Christopher S. Monk, Douglas E. Williamson, Bruce L. Miller, Annchen R. Knodt, Jillian Lee Wiggins, Melisa Carrasco, Ira M. Lesser, A. Darby and Spenser R. Radtke. Their work appears in journals such as Neuron, NeuroImage and American Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.