Laura Lorenzo‐López
- Physiology top 5%
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 0.5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ana MasedaJosé Carlos Millán-CalentíCarmen de LabraJosé Luis Rodríguez-VillamilElena AmenedoFernando CadaveiraAlba SánchezRocío López‐López
- Topics
- Frailty in Older Adults (21 papers)Nutrition and Health in Aging (17 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (16 papers)
In The Last Decade
Laura Lorenzo‐López
68 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
- Physiology 673
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 613
- Cognitive Neuroscience 502
- Psychiatry and Mental health 346
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 179
Countries citing papers authored by Laura Lorenzo‐López
This map shows the geographic impact of Laura Lorenzo‐López's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laura Lorenzo‐López with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laura Lorenzo‐López more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Laura Lorenzo‐López
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laura Lorenzo‐López. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laura Lorenzo‐López. The network helps show where Laura Lorenzo‐López may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laura Lorenzo‐López
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laura Lorenzo‐López. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laura Lorenzo‐López based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laura Lorenzo‐López. Laura Lorenzo‐López is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 25 | |
| 8 | 44 | |
| 9 | 61 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 33 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 33 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 18 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 54 |
About Laura Lorenzo‐López
Laura Lorenzo‐López is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 70 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Frailty in Older Adults (21 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (17 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (613 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (502 citations) and Physiology (673 citations). Laura Lorenzo‐López has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Portugal and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Ana Maseda, José Carlos Millán-Calentí, Carmen de Labra, José Luis Rodríguez-Villamil, Elena Amenedo, Fernando Cadaveira, Alba Sánchez, Rocío López‐López, Vanessa Valdiglesias and Paula Pazo-Álvarez. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage, Scientific Reports and Chemosphere.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.