Laura Blow
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Accounting top 5%
- Finance top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Co-authors
- Orazio AttanasioAndrew LeicesterRobert HamiltonTimothy K.M. BeattyThomas F. CrossleyIan CrawfordCormac O’DeaMartin Browning
- Topics
- Economic and Environmental Valuation (6 papers)Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (4 papers)Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesDenmark
In The Last Decade
Laura Blow
18 papers receiving 415 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Economics and Econometrics 310
- Accounting 186
- Finance 119
- Sociology and Political Science 52
- Gender Studies 51
Countries citing papers authored by Laura Blow
This map shows the geographic impact of Laura Blow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laura Blow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laura Blow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Laura Blow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laura Blow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laura Blow. The network helps show where Laura Blow may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laura Blow
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laura Blow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laura Blow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laura Blow. Laura Blow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | Using the CE to Model Household Demand | 1 |
| 5 | 64 | |
| 6 | 54 | |
| 7 | 29 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | Booms and busts: consumption, expectations and house prices in the UK | 3 |
| 10 | 200 | |
| 11 | Revealed Preference Methods for the Consumer Characteristics Model | 2 |
| 12 | 37 | |
| 13 | Parental background and child outcomes:how much does money matter, and what else matters? | 4 |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 4 |
About Laura Blow
Laura Blow is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Economics and Econometrics and Gender Studies, having authored 19 papers that have together received 443 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic and Environmental Valuation (6 papers), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (4 papers) and Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (33 citations), Accounting (186 citations) and Finance (119 citations). Laura Blow has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Orazio Attanasio, Andrew Leicester, Robert Hamilton, Timothy K.M. Beatty, Thomas F. Crossley, Ian Crawford, Cormac O’Dea, Martin Browning, Yu Zhu and Ian Walker. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic Journal, The Review of Economic Studies and Journal of Public Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.