Lane J. Mercer
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies 2
- Ureteral procedures and complications 2
- Urology top 5%
- Urological Disorders and Treatments 4
-
- Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics 2
- Maternal and fetal healthcare 1
-
- Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies 4
-
- Menstrual Health and Disorders 1
-
- Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications 1
- Co-authors
- Todd P. MargolisRobert E. PetresGuy M. BoikeNick M. SpirtosRobert L. SummittCharles E. MillerJeffrey M. FowlerJames W. Orr
- Journals
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (5 papers)International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics (1 paper)Obstetrics and Gynecology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Lane J. Mercer
16 papers receiving 409 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 160
- Urology 64
- Microbiology 30
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 85
- Surgery 186
Countries citing papers authored by Lane J. Mercer
This map shows the geographic impact of Lane J. Mercer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lane J. Mercer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lane J. Mercer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lane J. Mercer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lane J. Mercer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lane J. Mercer. The network helps show where Lane J. Mercer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lane J. Mercer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 98 | |
| 2 | 1994 | 53 | |
| 3 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 4 | 1993 | 79 | |
| 5 | 1991 | 9 | |
| 6 | 1989 | 12 | |
| 7 | 1988 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1988 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1988 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1987 | 6 | |
| 11 | Lactobacillemia of amniotic fluid origin. | 1986 | 18 |
| 12 | 1986 | 40 | |
| 13 | 1986 | 6 | |
| 14 | 1985 | 31 | |
| 15 | 1984 | 78 | |
| 16 | 1981 | 2 |
About Lane J. Mercer
Lane J. Mercer is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Urology and Pharmacy, having authored 16 papers that have together received 444 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies (4 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (4 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (2 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (2 papers), Ureteral procedures and complications (2 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (1 paper), Menstrual Health and Disorders (1 paper) and Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (160 citations), Urology (64 citations) and Microbiology (30 citations). Lane J. Mercer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Todd P. Margolis, Robert E. Petres, Guy M. Boike, Nick M. Spirtos, Robert L. Summitt, Charles E. Miller, Jeffrey M. Fowler, James W. Orr, David E. Soper and Donna Shoupe. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics and Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.