Richard M. Soderstrom
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Surgery
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Co-authors
- Donald E. MooreJanet R. DalingBruce V. StadelLeon R. SpadoniWong Ho ChowBarbara MetchNoel S. WeissDuane E. Townsend
- Topics
- Uterine Myomas and Treatments (5 papers)Reproductive Health and Contraception (4 papers)Reproductive Health and Technologies (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Richard M. Soderstrom
25 papers receiving 486 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 200
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 191
- Reproductive Medicine 172
- Surgery 142
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 77
Countries citing papers authored by Richard M. Soderstrom
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard M. Soderstrom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard M. Soderstrom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard M. Soderstrom more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard M. Soderstrom
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard M. Soderstrom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard M. Soderstrom. The network helps show where Richard M. Soderstrom may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard M. Soderstrom
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard M. Soderstrom. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard M. Soderstrom based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard M. Soderstrom. Richard M. Soderstrom is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 54 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 29 | |
| 8 | Operative laparoscopy : the masters' techniques | 12 |
| 9 | 67 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | Reducing bipolar sterilization failures. | 21 |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Richard M. Soderstrom
Richard M. Soderstrom is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 32 papers that have together received 554 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Uterine Myomas and Treatments (5 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (4 papers) and Reproductive Health and Technologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (200 citations), Reproductive Medicine (172 citations) and Microbiology (58 citations). Richard M. Soderstrom has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Donald E. Moore, Janet R. Daling, Bruce V. Stadel, Leon R. Spadoni, Wong Ho Chow, Barbara Metch, Noel S. Weiss, Duane E. Townsend, Antoni J. Dulęba and Noel S. Weiss. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.