Lance Porter

1.2k total citations
31 papers, 756 citations indexed

About

Lance Porter is a scholar working on Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Lance Porter has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 756 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Communication, 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 8 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Lance Porter's work include Digital Marketing and Social Media (10 papers), Media Studies and Communication (8 papers) and Public Relations and Crisis Communication (8 papers). Lance Porter is often cited by papers focused on Digital Marketing and Social Media (10 papers), Media Studies and Communication (8 papers) and Public Relations and Crisis Communication (8 papers). Lance Porter collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and Canada. Lance Porter's co-authors include Lynne M. Sallot, Kaye D. Sweetser, Deborah S. Chung, Ben W. Lewis, Eunseong Kim, Paige Jarreau, Carolina Acosta‐Alzuru, Kasey Windels, Daniel Toker and Glen T. Cameron and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Computers in Human Behavior and Sex Roles.

In The Last Decade

Lance Porter

30 papers receiving 665 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Lance Porter United States	16	406	381	137	135	120	31	756
Coy Callison United States	15	369 0.9×	362 1.0×	184 1.3×	107 0.8×	121 1.0×	34	848
Toby Hopp United States	16	325 0.8×	431 1.1×	47 0.3×	62 0.5×	91 0.8×	41	697
Xigen Li Hong Kong	14	303 0.7×	541 1.4×	151 1.1×	43 0.3×	196 1.6×	41	773
Jenny Power United States	3	280 0.7×	412 1.1×	58 0.4×	217 1.6×	81 0.7×	4	697
Caitlin McLaughlin Canada	11	172 0.4×	430 1.1×	73 0.5×	58 0.4×	116 1.0×	35	596
Chance York United States	10	387 1.0×	562 1.5×	68 0.5×	70 0.5×	43 0.4×	19	786
Beheruz N. Sethna United States	8	328 0.8×	321 0.8×	33 0.2×	318 2.4×	70 0.6×	21	721
John Raacke United States	5	524 1.3×	1.1k 2.9×	88 0.6×	92 0.7×	135 1.1×	7	1.3k
Heejo Keum United States	9	270 0.7×	491 1.3×	175 1.3×	64 0.5×	212 1.8×	24	775
Shaun W. Davenport United States	4	124 0.3×	382 1.0×	51 0.4×	186 1.4×	42 0.3×	6	632

Countries citing papers authored by Lance Porter

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lance Porter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lance Porter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lance Porter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lance Porter

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lance Porter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lance Porter. The network helps show where Lance Porter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lance Porter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lance Porter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lance Porter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lance Porter. Lance Porter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Porter, Lance, et al.. (2024). Moviegoing in the wake of a pandemic: Re-evaluating the attitudes, intentions, and behaviors of U.S. Moviegoers in the streaming era. Journal of Media Economics. 36(1-2). 29–46. 2 indexed citations

Porter, Lance, et al.. (2024). Theaters, social media, and streams: Evaluating social word-of-mouth patterns of pandemic-era blockbuster films on Twitter. Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 30(5). 1732–1746. 3 indexed citations

Bauer, Nichole M., et al.. (2023). Women’s Engagement in Political Discussion on Twitter: The Role of Gender Salience, Resources, and Race/Ethnicity. Sex Roles. 90(2). 250–266.

Jiang, Ke, et al.. (2022). Pundits, presenters, and promoters: Investigating gaps in digital production among social media users using self-reported and behavioral measures. First Monday. 1 indexed citations

Jarreau, Paige, et al.. (2019). Using selfies to challenge public stereotypes of scientists. PLoS ONE. 14(5). e0216625–e0216625. 52 indexed citations

Windels, Kasey & Lance Porter. (2019). Examining Consumers’ Recognition of Native and Banner Advertising on News Website Home Pages. Journal of Interactive Advertising. 20(1). 1–16. 11 indexed citations

Windels, Kasey, et al.. (2018). My friend likes this brand: Do ads with social context attract more attention on social networking sites?. Computers in Human Behavior. 84. 420–429. 35 indexed citations

Porter, Lance, et al.. (2018). Politics, Propaganda, and Public Health. 1 indexed citations

Jarreau, Paige & Lance Porter. (2017). Science in the Social Media Age: Profiles of Science Blog Readers. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 95(1). 142–168. 43 indexed citations

10.

Porter, Lance, et al.. (2015). Cognitive and Imagery Attributes of Parasocial Relationships. Imagination Cognition and Personality. 35(4). 359–379. 24 indexed citations

11.

Porter, Lance, et al.. (2012). It’s All in Your Head: The Evolution of Television, Parasociability and Imagined Interactions. 2 indexed citations

12.

Lewis, Ben W. & Lance Porter. (2010). In-Game Advertising Effects. Journal of Interactive Advertising. 10(2). 46–60. 87 indexed citations

13.

Porter, Lance. (2009). Communicating for the good of the state: A post-symmetrical polemic on persuasion in ethical public relations. Public Relations Review. 36(2). 127–133. 23 indexed citations

14.

Porter, Lance, Kaye D. Sweetser, & Deborah S. Chung. (2009). The blogosphere and public relations. Journal of Communication Management. 13(3). 250–267. 40 indexed citations

15.

Porter, Lance, et al.. (2008). One Size Does Not Fit All: Culture and Perceived Importance of Web Design Features. 3(1-2). 25–38. 6 indexed citations

16.

Chung, Deborah S., et al.. (2007). Uses and Perceptions of Blogs: A Report on Professional Journalists and Journalism Educators. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator. 62(3). 305–322. 30 indexed citations

17.

Porter, Lance, Kaye D. Sweetser, Deborah S. Chung, & Eunseong Kim. (2007). Blog power: Examining the effects of practitioner blog use on power in public relations. Public Relations Review. 33(1). 92–95. 89 indexed citations

18.

Sallot, Lynne M., Lance Porter, & Carolina Acosta‐Alzuru. (2004). Practitioners’ web use and perceptions of their own roles and power: a qualitative study. Public Relations Review. 30(3). 269–278. 47 indexed citations

19.

Porter, Lance & Lynne M. Sallot. (2003). The Internet and Public Relations: Investigating Practitioners' Roles and World Wide Web Use. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 80(3). 603–622. 45 indexed citations

20.

Porter, Lance, et al.. (2001). New Technologies and Public Relations: Exploring Practitioners' Use of Online Resources to Earn a Seat at the Management Table. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 78(1). 172–190. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact