L. van der Hoek

590 total citations
17 papers, 395 citations indexed

About

L. van der Hoek is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Epidemiology and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, L. van der Hoek has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 395 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in General Health Professions, 5 papers in Epidemiology and 4 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in L. van der Hoek's work include Chronic Disease Management Strategies (4 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (3 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (3 papers). L. van der Hoek is often cited by papers focused on Chronic Disease Management Strategies (4 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (3 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (3 papers). L. van der Hoek collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands and Taiwan. L. van der Hoek's co-authors include Mieke Rijken, Jany Rademakers, Monique Heijmans, Jessica Nijman, M. Heins, A.J.E. de Veer, J. Peeters, Anneke L. Francke, François Schellevis and Joke C. Korevaar and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, BMC Public Health and BMJ Open.

In The Last Decade

L. van der Hoek

14 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
L. van der Hoek Netherlands	8	126	120	98	74	61	17	395
Robin DiMatteo United States	5	142 1.1×	102 0.8×	161 1.6×	77 1.0×	39 0.6×	5	486
Homamodin Javadzade Iran	11	268 2.1×	81 0.7×	87 0.9×	61 0.8×	71 1.2×	35	480
Bruno Rushforth United Kingdom	8	176 1.4×	116 1.0×	138 1.4×	31 0.4×	141 2.3×	22	459
Virginia Scott United States	11	98 0.8×	191 1.6×	165 1.7×	58 0.8×	160 2.6×	43	620
David Samoocha Netherlands	9	175 1.4×	53 0.4×	51 0.5×	40 0.5×	68 1.1×	17	453
Edward A. Chow United States	9	130 1.0×	72 0.6×	121 1.2×	96 1.3×	75 1.2×	16	411
Appathurai Balamurugan United States	15	148 1.2×	177 1.5×	82 0.8×	89 1.2×	88 1.4×	35	683
Juan Canedo United States	11	142 1.1×	80 0.7×	75 0.8×	36 0.5×	142 2.3×	18	448
Heather Morris United States	14	96 0.8×	64 0.5×	75 0.8×	25 0.3×	33 0.5×	48	467
Kelly Howells United Kingdom	10	185 1.5×	109 0.9×	65 0.7×	22 0.3×	44 0.7×	20	388

Countries citing papers authored by L. van der Hoek

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L. van der Hoek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. van der Hoek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. van der Hoek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L. van der Hoek

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. van der Hoek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. van der Hoek. The network helps show where L. van der Hoek may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of L. van der Hoek

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of L. van der Hoek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of L. van der Hoek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with L. van der Hoek. L. van der Hoek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

Hoek, L. van der, et al.. (2018). Are low and high utilization related to the way GPs manage their practices? An observational study. BMC Family Practice. 19(1). 46–46. 4 indexed citations

Hoek, L. van der, et al.. (2018). Participatiemonitor 2008-2016: deelname aan de samenleving van mensen met een beperking en ouderen.. 1 indexed citations

Bakker, D.H. de, et al.. (2017). Assessing the precision of a time-sampling-based study among GPs: balancing sample size and measurement frequency. Human Resources for Health. 15(1). 81–81. 3 indexed citations

Boer, Dolf de, et al.. (2017). Do effects of common case-mix adjusters on patient experiences vary across patient groups?. BMC Health Services Research. 17(1). 768–768. 5 indexed citations

Hoek, L. van der, et al.. (2016). Use of general practice services 5 years after an episode of mental illness: case–control study using electronic records. British Journal of General Practice. 66(646). e347–e353. 7 indexed citations

Donker, Gé, et al.. (2016). Determinants of general practitioner's cancer-related gut feelings—a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 6(9). e012511–e012511. 24 indexed citations

Hendriks, Michelle, et al.. (2015). Ontwikkeling van de Care Related Quality of Life voor Chronisch Hartfalen (CaReQoL CHF): een vragenlijst voor het meten van de ervaren uitkomsten van chronische zorg.. 1 indexed citations

Rademakers, Jany, et al.. (2015). Clinicians’ beliefs and attitudes toward patient self-management in the Netherlands; translation and testing of the American Clinician Support for Patient Activation Measure (CS-PAM). BMC Health Services Research. 15(1). 138–138. 17 indexed citations

Hoek, L. van der, et al.. (2015). Geschatte lokale cijfers over gezondheid en gezondheidsdeterminanten ter ondersteuning van het gezondheidsbeleid. TSG - Tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen. 93(7). 274–280.

10.

Veer, A.J.E. de, et al.. (2014). CQ-index casemanagement dementie: de kwaliteit van casemanagement dementie vanuit het perspectief van de mantelzorger.. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).

11.

Hendriks, Michelle, et al.. (2014). CQ-index Radiotherapie: psychometrische eigenschappen en discriminerend vermogen van een vragenlijst voor het meten van de radiotherapeutische zorg vanuit patiëntenperspectief.. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1 indexed citations

12.

Heins, M., François Schellevis, Mieke Rijken, et al.. (2013). Partners of cancer patients consult their GPs significantly more often with both somatic and psychosocial problems. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care. 31(4). 203–208. 13 indexed citations

13.

Rademakers, Jany, Jessica Nijman, L. van der Hoek, Monique Heijmans, & Mieke Rijken. (2012). Measuring patient activation in the Netherlands: translation and validation of the American short form Patient Activation Measure (PAM13). BMC Public Health. 12(1). 577–577. 168 indexed citations

14.

Peeters, J., A.J.E. de Veer, L. van der Hoek, & Anneke L. Francke. (2012). Factors influencing the adoption of home telecare by elderly or chronically ill people: a national survey. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 21(21-22). 3183–3193. 54 indexed citations

15.

Heins, M., François Schellevis, Mieke Rijken, L. van der Hoek, & Joke C. Korevaar. (2012). Determinants of Increased Primary Health Care Use in Cancer Survivors. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 30(33). 4155–4160. 53 indexed citations

16.

Hoek, L. van der & Johannes E. Hovens. (2011). [Psychiatric diagnosis by telephone?].. PubMed. 53(7). 419–24. 2 indexed citations

17.

Bartelink, M L, et al.. (1998). Infections in patients with type 2 diabetes in general practice. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 40(1). 15–19. 42 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact