J. Peeters

1.3k total citations
27 papers, 925 citations indexed

About

J. Peeters is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Peeters has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 925 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in General Health Professions, 6 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 6 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in J. Peeters's work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers), Dutch Social and Cultural Studies (6 papers) and Healthcare innovation and challenges (5 papers). J. Peeters is often cited by papers focused on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers), Dutch Social and Cultural Studies (6 papers) and Healthcare innovation and challenges (5 papers). J. Peeters collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Sweden and Ireland. J. Peeters's co-authors include Anneke L. Francke, A.J.E. de Veer, A. Brabers, G. I. Tesser, R.D. Friele, Jany Rademakers, François Schellevis, E. C. Beuvery, Peter Spreeuwenberg and Marieke Zwaanswijk and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Journal of Immunological Methods and BMC Health Services Research.

In The Last Decade

J. Peeters

25 papers receiving 882 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J. Peeters Netherlands 13 412 178 147 146 144 27 925
Carme Carrión Spain 16 313 0.8× 76 0.4× 149 1.0× 73 0.5× 117 0.8× 65 884
Nadine Tremblay Canada 9 212 0.5× 38 0.2× 113 0.8× 54 0.4× 87 0.6× 15 691
Colleen Cunningham United Kingdom 19 133 0.3× 102 0.6× 171 1.2× 119 0.8× 111 0.8× 46 1.5k
Yimin Cheng China 19 122 0.3× 90 0.5× 221 1.5× 119 0.8× 164 1.1× 66 1.0k
Joseph Azuri Israel 16 132 0.3× 39 0.2× 50 0.3× 131 0.9× 64 0.4× 76 832
Daniel S. Gardner United States 15 224 0.5× 24 0.1× 197 1.3× 116 0.8× 46 0.3× 39 689
Benjamin Johnson United States 19 139 0.3× 78 0.4× 75 0.5× 263 1.8× 57 0.4× 53 1.3k
Daniel J. Amante United States 16 448 1.1× 19 0.1× 110 0.7× 93 0.6× 115 0.8× 34 921
Miyoung Kim South Korea 17 250 0.6× 182 1.0× 147 1.0× 221 1.5× 130 0.9× 111 1.1k
Eva McGhee United States 7 398 1.0× 30 0.2× 145 1.0× 138 0.9× 282 2.0× 9 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by J. Peeters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Peeters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Peeters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Peeters more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Peeters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Peeters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Peeters. The network helps show where J. Peeters may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Peeters

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Peeters. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Peeters based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Peeters. J. Peeters is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Evers, Luc J. W., J. Peeters, Bastiaan R. Bloem, & Marjan J. Meinders. (2023). Need for personalized monitoring of Parkinson’s disease: the perspectives of patients and specialized healthcare providers. Frontiers in Neurology. 14. 1150634–1150634. 16 indexed citations
2.
Thijssen, Marjolein, Ramon Daniëls, Monique A. S. Lexis, et al.. (2021). How do community based dementia friendly initiatives work for people with dementia and their caregivers, and why? A rapid realist review. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 37(2). 19 indexed citations
3.
4.
Peeters, J., Anne Margriet Pot, J. de Lange, Peter Spreeuwenberg, & Anneke L. Francke. (2016). Does the organisational model of dementia case management make a difference in satisfaction with case management and caregiver burden? An evaluation study. BMC Geriatrics. 16(1). 65–65. 7 indexed citations
5.
Veer, A.J.E. de, et al.. (2016). Naar een toekomst met meer wijkverpleegkundigen? De aantrekkelijkheid van het werken in de thuiszorg en het doorstromen van MBO- naar HBO-Verpleegkunde..
6.
Peeters, J., et al.. (2016). ‘Omdat ik het belangrijk vind om goed voor mezelf te zorgen’: rapportage eHealth-doelstellingen 2016.. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 2 indexed citations
7.
Veer, A.J.E. de, J. Peeters, A. Brabers, et al.. (2015). Determinants of the intention to use e-Health by community dwelling older people. BMC Health Services Research. 15(1). 103–103. 211 indexed citations
8.
Peeters, J., et al.. (2015). ‘Dan kan ik er misschien zelf iets aan doen’: tussenrapportage eHealth-monitor 2015.. Research portal (Tilburg University). 1 indexed citations
9.
10.
Peeters, J., T.A. Wiegers, & R.D. Friele. (2013). How Technology in Care at Home Affects Patient Self-Care and Self-Management: A Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 10(11). 5541–5564. 39 indexed citations
11.
Peeters, J., et al.. (2012). Key factors influencing the implementation success of a home telecare application. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 81(6). 415–423. 39 indexed citations
12.
Peeters, J., A.J.E. de Veer, L. van der Hoek, & Anneke L. Francke. (2012). Factors influencing the adoption of home telecare by elderly or chronically ill people: a national survey. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 21(21-22). 3183–3193. 54 indexed citations
13.
Peeters, J., Patriek Mistiaen, & Anneke L. Francke. (2011). Costs and financial benefits of video communication compared to usual care at home: a systematic review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 17(8). 403–411. 11 indexed citations
14.
Peeters, J., Anneke L. Francke, & Anne Margriet Pot. (2011). Organisatie en invulling van "casemanagement dementie" in Nederland: verslaglegging van een landelijke peiling onder regionale projectleiders. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1 indexed citations
16.
Zwaanswijk, Marieke, et al.. (2010). Problemen en wensen van mantelzorgers van mensen met dementie: een vergelijking tussen de beginfase en latere fasen in het ziekteproces. Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie. 41(4). 162–171. 4 indexed citations
17.
Peeters, J., Anneke L. Francke, R.D. Friele, et al.. (2008). Development and Initial Testing of an Instrument to Establish Eating Profiles of Clients in Nursing Homes or Elderly Homes. Journal of Nutrition for the Elderly. 27(1-2). 47–64. 3 indexed citations
18.
Peeters, J. & Anneke L. Francke. (2007). Indicatiestelling voor AWBZ-zorg, sector Verpleging en Verzorging, Thuiszorg: ontwikkelingen, knelpunten en oplossingsrichtingen.. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 3 indexed citations
19.
Peeters, J., et al.. (1989). Comparison of four bifunctional reagents for coupling peptides to proteins and the effect of the three moieties on the immunogenicity of the conjugates. Journal of Immunological Methods. 120(1). 133–143. 105 indexed citations
20.
Peeters, J., et al.. (1986). Rapid and efficient method for the preparation of Fmoc‐amino acids starting from 9‐fluorenylmethanol. International journal of peptide & protein research. 27(4). 398–400. 91 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026