Dolf de Boer

1.9k total citations
48 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Dolf de Boer is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Dolf de Boer has authored 48 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in General Health Professions, 18 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 12 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Dolf de Boer's work include Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (21 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (14 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (10 papers). Dolf de Boer is often cited by papers focused on Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (21 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (14 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (10 papers). Dolf de Boer collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Singapore. Dolf de Boer's co-authors include Diana Delnoij, B. Wiering, Jany Rademakers, Eco J. C. de Geus, Gonneke Willemsen, Nina Kupper, Dorret I. Boomsma, Daniëlle Posthuma, Christopher Ring and Douglas Carroll and has published in prestigious journals such as Circulation, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychophysiology.

In The Last Decade

Dolf de Boer

47 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Dolf de Boer Netherlands 19 475 185 183 179 102 48 1.2k
Sheena E Ramsay United Kingdom 29 389 0.8× 220 1.2× 254 1.4× 382 2.1× 211 2.1× 111 2.2k
Antje Gößwald Germany 18 356 0.7× 71 0.4× 166 0.9× 196 1.1× 201 2.0× 37 1.0k
Daniel O. Clark United States 23 521 1.1× 93 0.5× 128 0.7× 331 1.8× 126 1.2× 43 1.8k
Younhee Kang South Korea 19 388 0.8× 74 0.4× 211 1.2× 151 0.8× 75 0.7× 98 1.1k
Anita K. Wagner United States 6 258 0.5× 206 1.1× 54 0.3× 114 0.6× 110 1.1× 9 1.1k
Lars Hagberg Sweden 21 231 0.5× 93 0.5× 64 0.3× 227 1.3× 92 0.9× 48 1.0k
Dirk Devroey Belgium 20 352 0.7× 100 0.5× 149 0.8× 522 2.9× 207 2.0× 125 1.4k
Hidenori Amano Japan 26 434 0.9× 148 0.8× 109 0.6× 354 2.0× 174 1.7× 74 2.2k
Jo Ellen Wilbur United States 6 200 0.4× 83 0.4× 78 0.4× 212 1.2× 80 0.8× 7 877
Mirjam Curno United States 6 209 0.4× 89 0.5× 92 0.5× 577 3.2× 106 1.0× 8 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Dolf de Boer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dolf de Boer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dolf de Boer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dolf de Boer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dolf de Boer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dolf de Boer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dolf de Boer. The network helps show where Dolf de Boer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dolf de Boer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dolf de Boer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dolf de Boer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dolf de Boer. Dolf de Boer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Valderas, José M, Ian Porter, Jonathan P Evans, et al.. (2025). International survey of people living with chronic conditions: development and evaluation of the PaRIS Patient Questionnaire (PaRIS-PQ) in 18 countries. BMJ Quality & Safety. bmjqs–2025.
3.
Sočan, Gregor, et al.. (2023). Psychometric Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Patient Experiences with Outpatient Healthcare. Slovenian Journal of Public Health. 62(3). 153–161. 4 indexed citations
4.
Καϊτελίδου, Δάφνη, Charalampos Economou, Petros Galanis, et al.. (2019). Development and validation of measurement tools for user experience evaluation surveys in the public primary healthcare facilities in Greece: a mixed methods study. BMC Family Practice. 20(1). 49–49. 9 indexed citations
5.
Wiegers, T.A., et al.. (2019). Users’ Experiences With Web-Based Health Care Information: Qualitative Study About Diabetes and Dementia Information Presented on a Governmental Website. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 21(7). e11340–e11340. 4 indexed citations
6.
Desomer, Anja, Koen Van den Heede, James Paget, et al.. (2018). Het gebruik van patiëntuitkomsten en -ervaringen (PROMs/PREMs) voor klinische en beleidsdoeleinden. 2 indexed citations
7.
Desomer, Anja, Koen Van den Heede, James Paget, et al.. (2018). Use of patient-reported outcome and experience measures in patient care and policy. 21 indexed citations
9.
Desomer, Anja, Koen Van den Heede, James Paget, et al.. (2018). Use of patient-reported outcome and experience measures in patient care and policy. 1 indexed citations
10.
Wiering, B., Dolf de Boer, & Diana Delnoij. (2017). Meeting patient expectations: patient expectations and recovery after hip or knee surgery. MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY. 102(3). 231–240. 17 indexed citations
11.
Wiering, B., Dolf de Boer, & Diana Delnoij. (2017). Patient involvement in the development of patient-reported outcome measures: The developers’ perspective. BMC Health Services Research. 17(1). 635–635. 44 indexed citations
12.
Dierendonck, Machteld C. Van, P. P. C. A. Menheere, Eric van Breda, et al.. (2014). Effect of different head and neck positions on behaviour, heart rate variability and cortisol levels in lunged Royal Dutch Sport horses. The Veterinary Journal. 202(1). 26–32. 47 indexed citations
13.
Boer, Dolf de, et al.. (2013). Overall scores as an alternative to global ratings in patient experience surveys; a comparison of four methods. BMC Health Services Research. 13(1). 479–479. 14 indexed citations
14.
Rademakers, Jany, Diana Delnoij, Jessica Nijman, & Dolf de Boer. (2012). Educational inequalities in patient-centred care: patients' preferences and experiences. BMC Health Services Research. 12(1). 261–261. 43 indexed citations
15.
Zuidgeest, M., Diana Delnoij, Katrien Luijkx, Dolf de Boer, & Gert P. Westert. (2012). Patients' experiences of the quality of long-term care among the elderly: comparing scores over time. BMC Health Services Research. 12(1). 26–26. 20 indexed citations
16.
Boer, Dolf de, Diana Delnoij, & Jany Rademakers. (2010). Do patient experiences on priority aspects of health care predict their global rating of quality of care? A study in five patient groups. Health Expectations. 13(3). 285–297. 49 indexed citations
18.
Boer, Dolf de, Christopher Ring, & Douglas Carroll. (2006). Time course and mechanisms of hemoconcentration in response to mental stress. Biological Psychology. 72(3). 318–324. 13 indexed citations
19.
Boer, Dolf de, et al.. (2006). Mental stress‐induced hemoconcentration and its recovery: A controlled study of time course and mechanisms. Psychophysiology. 44(1). 161–169. 18 indexed citations
20.
Zanten, Jet Veldhuijzen, Dolf de Boer, Lesley K. Harrison, et al.. (2002). Effects of competitiveness on haemostatic and haemodynamic reactions to competition stress. Psychosomatic Medicine. 64. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026